Editorial: Dan Bishop needs to represent constituents, not his ideological self-interest
Thursday, April 18, 2024 -- How out of step is U.S. Rep. Dan Bishop of Charlotte with the nation, North Carolina and even most of his fellow Republicans? A look at last week's key votes in the U.S. House of Representatives offers a clear and dramatic illustration.
Posted — UpdatedLast week the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed the “Stronger Workforce For America Act,” sponsored by North Carolina Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx. The legislation, according to Foxx, is “a bill for those who believe in the incredible, boundless potential of the American workforce.” It expands skills development, “strengthens the relationship between employers and the workforce system and put more Americans on the pathway to successful careers.”
It is worthy of note here that Foxx is among the most staunchly conservative Republicans in the U.S. House.
Not a single Democrat – including those in the North Carolina delegation – voted against Foxx’s bill.
The vote on Foxx’s bill – and two other pieces of legislation that overwhelmingly passed the U.S. House of Representatives last week -- are stark and stunning displays of just how ideologically rigid Bishop is, how his political isolation fails the needs of his constituents he is supposed to represent.
Just what else last week did Bishop – the ONLY North Carolina representative to do so – vote against? How far out of the broad consensus was he?
In just one week Bishop voted against broadly bipartisan, consensus legislation to: Help American workers; Save endangered turtles and; Recognize opportunities for children to play and learn. The reality is these votes are more reflective of Bishop’s typical voting behavior than any kind of exception. It must be noted that Bishop, when a member of the state legislature, was the author of the notorious and disastrous 2016 House Bill 2. It was later essentially repealed – with a majority of Republicans and Democrats supporting the move.
Quite a record for someone who also is seeking statewide office – attorney general –in North Carolina.
What does that say about whose interests he’ll be representing? What does it say about the priorities he’ll bring to the critical position of representing the state in legal matters, providing legal guidance, when requested, to the governor, the General Assembly and other public agencies and other duties?
Will he be guided by what is best for the ideological and partisan biases of Dan Bishop or by the law and what is best for the state?
Bishop’s record, particularly as reflected by his votes last week, provides the clear answer.
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.