Fact check: Democrat touts vote on police body camera law
A Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in North Carolina says he was among a small group of legislators who opposed the so-called "body camera law" that permits a judge to shield footage of Andrew Brown Jr.'s death from the public.
Posted — UpdatedYour browser doesn't support HTML5 video.
A Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in North Carolina says he was among a small group of legislators who opposed the so-called “body camera law” that permits a judge to shield footage of Andrew Brown Jr.’s death from the public.
Brown, 42, was killed on April 21 while Pasquotank County deputies served drug-related search and arrest warrants at his house in Elizabeth City.
However, a Superior Court judge on April 28 refused to release the video to the public. A state law gives judges discretion over whether to make such footage public.
Senate candidate Jeff Jackson recently tweeted about his record on the issue as a member of the state Senate.
“In 2016, then Gov. [Pat] McCrory signed HB 972 into law. It had passed the state Senate 48-2. I was one of the 2 who voted against it,” he tweeted May 3.
One of Jackson’s opponents in the Democratic primary, Erica Smith, also served in North Carolina’s state Senate at the time. McCrory is also running for the US Senate seat, on the Republican side.
So, given the national attention on North Carolina’s body cam law amid the Senate race, we wondered: Is Jackson telling the truth?
The answer is yes.
Change in the law
In Brown’s case, his family says they were shown only 20 seconds of footage captured by body cameras on Pasquotank County deputies.
So they appealed to Superior Court, which HB 972 gives them the right to do. The judge ruled that Brown’s family can see more of the video, but he refused to release it to the media.
The 2016 bill
Jackson explained his position when asked about the bill in an election debate that October.
“I voted against it because it enabled a situation where, if you were mistreated by the police, say, when you were stopped for a speeding ticket, it made it very difficult for you to see the video even if you yourself were pictured in that video. You have to go to court if the police say no. And then once you go to court, it’s really difficult to win because you have to prove that the police abused their discretion, which is the highest civil standard under the law.”
Smith, one of Jackson’s opponents in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate, also served in the state Senate at the time. She voted to pass it. In a Twitter message exchange with a PolitiFact reporter, Smith focused on the positives of the bill while saying reform is still needed.
“Along with almost the entire Democratic caucus, I voted for the bill to guarantee that officers' body cams and dash cams would remain on at all times, increasing accountability and ensuring that there would always be footage. I believed at the time, as I believe now, that the process to release that footage was made far too restrictive and support the ongoing efforts to reform that. Given the realities of the NCGA at the time, I wanted to ensure that we did what we could to increase accountability albeit a flawed piece of legislation that we had aspirations of returning to and improving.”
Smith has been speaking to protestors in Elizabeth City about the need for more transparency in policing. Other candidates in North Carolina’s U.S. Senate race didn’t serve in the legislature.
Our ruling
Jackson said he was “one of the 2 (state Senators) who voted against” North Carolina’s body camera law.
Records show that is True.
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.