Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

2:32 a.m. • 5-20-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 78° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 86° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2010-04-15 15:00:00
Updated: 2010-04-15 18:06:44

Soldier sentenced to die for 1985 triple murder


Sketch of Timothy Hennis court-martial
Sketch of Timothy Hennis court-martial
print friendly

Twenty-five years after a Fayetteville woman and two small children were slain, a former Fort Bragg soldier was sentenced Thursday to death in his third trial for the crimes.

Last week, a panel of 14 Army officers and enlisted personnel found Master Sgt. Timothy Hennis guilty of three counts of premeditated murder for the May 9, 1985, stabbing deaths of Kathryn Eastburn and two of her daughters, 5-year-old Kara and 3-year-old Erin, in their Summerhill Road home.

Jurors deliberated about 13 hours over three days this week before reaching the unanimous decision on the death sentence. The verdict also included a dishonorable discharge, a reduction in rank and forfeiture of all military pay and benefits.

Hennis showed no emotion as the verdict was read. His wife, Angela, and his sister, Beth Brumfield, cried quietly.

Air Force Capt. Gary Eastburn and his daughter, Jana, who was 22 months old at the time of the slayings and was left unharmed in her crib, also cried upon hearing the sentence.

"I think he deserves to die for what he did," Gary Eastburn said later outside the Fort Bragg courthouse. "(It's) not very Christian-like, but there's nothing he can say to me that would make me forgive him."

The court-martial was Hennis' third trial for the crimes. He was convicted in state court in 1986 but won an appeal and was acquitted in a second trial three years later. He finished out his service in the Army and retired to Washington state.

Gary Eastburn said he decided to move on with his life after Hennis' acquittal and rear his surviving daughter as a single parent.

Years later, DNA tests not available in the 1980s linked Hennis to sperm found on Kathryn Eastburn. Because Hennis couldn't be tried in state court again, the case was turned over to the Army to pursue a court-martial.

Seeing Hennis in court every day in recent weeks has dredged up horrific memories, Gary Eastburn said.

"Seeing him just kind of reminds you of how things were and that he had 20-some years of free time off," he said. "This time has been the worst of the three, probably because I'm older. It's been a real emotional roller-coaster."

Jurors appeared to be split Wednesday, questioning whether Hennis would be eligible for parole if sentenced to life in prison and the impact of a divided vote.

After much debate, Col. Patrick Parrish declined to provide the jury with information about military parole regulations. He also urged them to continue deliberating until they reached a decision.

Under military regulations, a death sentence requires a unanimous vote of the jury, and at least 11 members had to vote for a life sentence for one to be imposed. Any other split of the jury would have resulted in a mistrial in the sentencing phase and would have necessitated empaneling another jury to hand down a sentence.

Defense attorney Frank Spinner said the gruesome crime scene photos and the DNA evidence likely swayed jurors in voting for the death sentence.

"How could a man who's led such an exemplary life be the same man who committed these murders?" Spinner asked. "Timothy Hennis has maintained his innocence from Day One. We will continue to fight for his innocence in the appeals."

One issue they plan to pursue on appeal is their contention that the Army didn't have jurisdiction to prosecute the case. They cite previous court decisions that the military cannot prosecute service members for crimes committed while they were in the armed forces once they had been discharged.

Spinner said Hennis' family is heartbroken over the jury's decision, and Gary Eastburn said he understands that family's grief.

"My heart goes out to them. I can certainly relate to the pain they're feeling," he said.

Hennis will join five other men on the military's death row. They include Hasan Akbar, who was convicted at Fort Bragg in 2005 of killing two fellow soldiers in Iraq; former Fort Bragg soldier Ronald Gray, who killed two people and committed three rapes in December 1986 and January 1987; and Camp Lejeune Marine Kenneth Parker, who killed two fellow Marines with a shotgun in 1992.


52 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Here is what I would like to know, where is the precedent for this type of case? Has this ever happened before, if so, can someone provide the case for reference?

If this has not happened before, I suspect that this will be overturned by the Supreme Court. I doubt the Supreme Court would ever allow double jeopardy to occur, even if this was seperate.

If I am not mistaken, yes, someone who retires can be recalled at any time, however, the service member being recalled has the oppurtunity to say no and the expense of no longer collecting retirement pay. Officer can resign their Commission and forfiet all retirement pay, same as enlisted, minus resigning their commission.

Why wasn't he convicted in the first trial? BECAUSE HE IS INNOCENT! The military does not have the right to prosecute a crime that was committed off base! Unbelievable!

Everyone that thinks the military should just take jurisdiction is wrong. It does not work that way. If a crime by a service member is committed off base it is at the discretion of the DA as to whether they will allow military authorities to take the case. It isn't the decision of the military authorities. If it were then no member would ever get a ticket, dui, or domestic violence charges at the hands of civilian authorities. Our justice system isn't large enough to handle all violations of the UCMJ that occur off base. I'm not saying that we have a large number of criminals in the military but we do have a proportionate amount as per our base population. So before all you civilians assume that the military shirks its responsiblities get the facts don't assume.

Semper Fi, Top J

Thanks for the clarification Some Random Guy. Can they not waive Laurean's discharge and bring him back in? I know a guy I went to school with was discharged from the Marines in 2001 for hazing a lower ranking soldier. In 2007, they called him and asked if he wanted to re-enlist and have his discharge waived and take a drop in rank to come back.

1 down and 1 more to go(cooper)

View Comments VIEW ALL 52 COMMENTS