Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

4:37 a.m. • 2-7-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 60° F
  • Wed: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 56° F
  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Jury awards $500,000 to spurned wife


e-mail print friendly
Laura Patterson, alienation of affection lawsuit
Laura Patterson, alienation of affection lawsuit

A Hoke County woman owes her husband's former wife $500,000 after a jury ruled that she broke up a 50-year marriage.

Laura Patterson sued Herlinda Basurto in December 2007, alleging alienation of affection and criminal conversation, a legal term for adultery.

Patterson blamed Basurto, 30, for seducing her husband, Alford Patterson, 69. The couple married in 1957 and divorced last year, and Alford Patterson and Basurto subsequently married.

"The facts of the case were very compelling," said Angela Hatley, the attorney for Laura Patterson. "(Basurto) certainly had motive and intent to destroy this marriage."

The suit states that the Pattersons reared two children and "acquired substantial property and wealth" during their marriage from the mobile home park they owned off U.S. Highway 401 Business in Raeford. It alleges that Basurto met Alford Patterson in 2005 when the Pattersons were selling their business – Basurto's brother bought part of it – and that they had a not-so-secret affair for several months.

Laura Patterson said in the suit that she was so humiliated that she moved out of her Raeford house to a mobile home in Holden Beach that she and her husband own.

A jury deliberated for 30 minutes Friday before ruling in her favor.

"I don’t think that the jury knew what they were doing,” Alford Patterson said. "I mean, think about it. Half a million dollars, and Laura's sitting at the beach now as if she's going to get that, which she won't. I mean, you don't get something that isn't there."

He said the 50 years they spent together was anything but marital bliss.

"(We) had problems from Day 1," he said. “Laura tried to portray this as being the most lovable marriage that ever hit the United States."

Laura Patterson had several affairs of her own through the years, her ex-husband said.

She denied that allegation.

"I waited four years for this day," she said in a telephone interview. "I wanted everyone to know what happened. I've never been with another man in my life except my husband. Everyone who knows me will verify it."

Hatley said she would make every effort to ensure the that settlement is paid.

Basurto said she thinks her husband is worth every penny.

"I love that guy. He's good to me and my family, and I love him," she said.

RELATED TOPICS: Raeford, Hoke County

e-mail print friendly

97 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 97 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
This was an unfair trial because at least one of the jury on duty is also a woman whose husband cheated on her. This verdict should be negated.

http://www.survivinginfidelity.com/forums.asp?tid=299143

Quote:

"I just served jury duty on an Alienation of Affection/ Criminal Conversation suit. This woman had LESS evidence than I do and we awarded her 500 K.

Here's the link to "my" story> I'm thinking about telling OW to anticipate being served!"

The real issue is that NC law forces a 50%/50% split of assets, without regard to fault. If adulterers were forced to pay when the marriage dissolves, via giving additional marital property to the injured party, then there would be no need for laws like these.

This woman is obviously very bitter and it's no wonder she got dumped.

paulej: Definitely agree with you. Laura was going to give this man a heart attack by being an impossible woman. If he met someone that loved life has to continue

I've read all of these comments [and judgements] and it seems that everybody missed an important point. The wife left him. She dissolved the marriage. It doesn't matter 'why' she left, because the other woman or whatever..the fact is that she left the marriage. There are a lot of marriages where one or the other 'forgives' the cheating spouse and the marriage is healed. This first wife just took off, and did not try to heal the marriage. I'm not laying blame on anybody. It happens. But while people here are taking sides and blaming one or the other, remember, it takes two to make or break a marriage.

View Comments VIEW ALL 97 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here