Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

9:27 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Principal: Class rankings create 'unnatural' competition


e-mail print friendly
Principal Thomas Humble
Principal Thomas Humble

When Meg Barrow applied to Harvard University, she told them her GPA – a 4.0 – but there was one piece of information she couldn’t give them – her class ranking.

Raleigh Charter High School, where Barrows is a senior, has joined a growing number of schools that have stopped tracking class rankings.

“We feel like it creates an unnecessary and unnatural competition between and among students,” said Principal Thomas Humble. “We want the competition to be within the individual student.”

More than half of all high schools no longer report student rankings, according to a survey by the National Association for College Admission Counseling, which represents high school guidance counselors and college admissions officers.

Christoph Guttentag, with Duke University’s admissions office, said about half of the 24,000 applications the university has received this year did not include a class rank.

“These small differences in a grade here and a grade there aren’t really that important when it comes to understanding how good a student is,” Guttentag said.

Some admissions officers say that, in a class of 500, it doesn’t matter whether a students is fifth or 15th.

At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, one-third of this year's applicants did not report a class rank, according to UNC officials. While UNC and Duke said they prefer to know a student's class rank, they see it as only part of the story.

Guttentag said, if given the choice between two students – one with a rank 10 places higher and the other who is more involved in extracurricular activities and who participates in class – he’d pick the student with the lower grades.

“I have no qualms about taking the student whose grades are a little lower,” he said.

North Carolina requires public schools to put class rank on transcripts. Raleigh Charter High School bypasses that by blacking out that part of the document. The North Carolina School of Science and Math in Durham is exempt from the law and does not track rankings.

RELATED TOPICS: Public Schools, Raleigh, Durham, Duke University

e-mail print friendly

113 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 113 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Whats unnatural?

I agree with kittiboo. Those kids are already working hard and competing, this isn't about the cream rising to the top, these kids ARE the cream of the crop. They'd all be Valedictorians and Salutatorians out in public school. But they're in a Charter school. In that kind of environment, there's already so much competition, there's no need to rank. I think the example from the episode of Malcolm in the Middle is a good example of WHY there is no need for rank.

When I was in high school, I had all As and Bs and was in AP/excellerated classes. This was before AP classes were weighted, so there were people ranked higher than me who were taking the academic equivalent of tiddliwinks, making As and ranking higher than me, while I was busting my tail in AP Physics and Calculus. The ranking system is outdated and I applaude this school.

Has anyone pointed out that RCHS is a CHARTER school, meaning people have to APPLY to go there? Hence, only parents/students that give a darn about education are going to be applying, hence academic success rates/SAT participation/score are going to be higher.

CONT. As I know several professionals (with various types and levels of education - Dr., lawyers, professors, teachers, etc.), most (though not all) say similar things. They didn't really learn anything in school (prior to graduate school) they couldn't teach themselves (or already know in a lot of cases). That's why the biggest, most well lit, most comfortably furnished room in my home is not the "TV" room, but the library. I know that my kid will be able to learn, on his own, more than what any school will want or be able to teach him. You want your kid to be an academic success, take him to the library and let him read anything he wants.

Ken - No, my dispute is with worthless public education. Except for a very few exceptional teachers, my public education was useless. One useful teacher taught English, including, but not limited to, conjugation and sentence structure. She was what you would call "old-school". I had one math teacher who taught me multiplication, division and fractions. Other than those two teachers, I either: 1) knew everything a teacher attempted to "teach" before I attended the class by reading a book on the subject; or, 2) was able to absorb enough solely by attending class to make an A. Elementary School was a joke. Middle school was not much better (see, e.g. those two teachers above). High School was garbage. I taught myself algebra, geometry and biology. I already knew enough history/civics/English/algebra (HS physics is basically algebra with defined terms) to make an A in everything else. College was just advanced HS. Grad school is the first place I really "learned" anything new.

View Comments VIEW ALL 113 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here