Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

1:08 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

GOP state legislators propose probation fixes


e-mail print friendly
Probation Jail Prison
Probation Jail Prison

Two Republican state lawmakers Tuesday announced a plan that they say can help fix the state's troubled probation system.

Sen. Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, and Rep. Paul Stam, R-Wake, filed Senate Bill 123, which would allow any law enforcement officer to perform warrantless searches on probationers. It would also require probationers to submit to random drug tests.

"This is a way to address our growing crime problem, our growing criminal problem," Berger said.

Of the 117,779 people on probation or parole in the state, 60 percent have court-ordered warrantless searches and 68 percent have court-ordered drug testing, according to the North Carolina Department of Correction.

Approximately 14,000 are unaccounted for, including 942 in Wake County and 832 in Durham County.

That's why Berger and Stam say they also sent a letter to Gov. Bev Perdue asking that the state publish on the Internet a list of all probation absconders and their last known addresses.

"If we put on a Web site their pictures and last known address – there are 8 million people statewide who might know where some of them are," Stam said.

Perdue spokeswoman Chrissy Pearson said the governor welcomes all suggestions and that her office is looking forward to working with the General Assembly on the issue.

Sarah Preston, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina, said that people on probation or parole should expect less privacy. The organization's concern, however, is that others who share a house or car could be mistakenly or illegally searched.

Republican leaders say some study is needed, but hope their ideas will prompt changes.

The state's probation-parole system came under intense scrutiny last year when suspects charged in a number of high-profile criminal cases were found to be on probation when the crimes occurred.

Most publicized were the cases of two men charged in the shooting deaths of University of North Carolina senior Eve Carson in March and Duke University graduate student Abhijit Mahato in January 2008.

Probation officers lost track of the suspects in those cases, despite other arrests and charges. One suspect was in court days before Carson's slaying, but the matter was rescheduled.

Robert Guy, then-director of the state Department of Correction's Division of Community Corrections, defended his staff during an interview in December, saying the work that probation officers do is limited, in part, by funding and staffing needs.

Since problems came to light, the state has allocated $2.5 million for new jobs in probation and parole offices.

All probation officers are also now required to use a new, $75,000, Web-based information system that allows them to better track their caseloads.

RELATED TOPICS: Eve Carson, Durham County, Abhijit Mahato, Wake County, Durham, Duke University, Beverly Perdue, ACLU

e-mail print friendly

21 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 21 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
People should remember that Probation means the offender gets early release or avoids prison/jail; however, they are still subject to punishment for their crimes. (i.e.... the should be a ward of the State). Just because we are not physically housing them, does not mean they should not be subject to the same rules and requirements, searches as all the other prisoners.

That is what probation is.... a Prisoner without the bars. It is their time to earn the right to be back in society. They should have as little right to freedom and expectation of privacy as any other prisoner. PERIOD!

Lets put them in tent jails for the minor offenders. Bologna or ham sandwich for lunch, dinner is mac and cheese. feed them same menu they give the kids at school. that will keep them from being a repeat convict.

three electric fences, build it out in the country so it will be isolated.

colliedave, you are 100% correct, just like those that skip bail, they loose.

Drug tests and lets add firearms search, test them for GSR (gun shot residue).

A probationer has been convicted of a crime and in place of being sent to prison, he has been placed on probation. His civil rights have not been restored so he should be to be searched w/o a warrent.

The problem with the probation system is not that the probation officers do not have authority to conduct searches or perform drug tests. They already have the authority to do both. Thus, this bill is not going to remedy the real problem of officers losing track of their probationers, which is not a system wide problem; only in high population counties like Wake, Durham and maybe a couple more. Another real problem is legislators who think they have to get their names on a bill for re-election purposes, which results in more worthless legislation than anything else. The true test of a piece of legislation is whether it solves the identified problem.

View Comments VIEW ALL 21 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here