Local News

Charges dropped in fatal helicopter crash

Posted July 21, 2008

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— Prosecutors have dropped criminal charges against a helicopter pilot in a crash that killed a Franklin County deputy four years ago.

Ben Barrick was charged with involuntary manslaughter in the May 2004 crash that killed Deputy Ted Horton.

An investigation revealed that metal fatigue caused the tail boom to fail, resulting in the fatal crash. A National Transportation Safety Board investigator also concluded Barrick's inexperience as a pilot led to the crash.

Federal law prohibits the investigator from testifying about his conclusions or opinions about the crash, and Franklin County District Attorney Sam Currin said he didn't have enough evidence to proceed with the case against Barrick without that testimony.

Barrick still faces civil suits in the crash.

Officials have alleged that Barrick deceived the county, signing a secret deal with the former sheriff to put a faulty helicopter in service and burden Franklin County with liability.

The lease agreement called for a helicopter in excellent condition, and authorities said Barrick chose to fly it despite warnings that it hadn't been properly maintained.

3 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • meh_whatever Jul 21, 2008

    It is unfortunate, because one of the kindest, dearest people I have ever known was killed in that crash. It makes me sad to read this story. Very sad. I don't care much for lawsuits, don't get me wrong, but it does seem like there was some sort of failure to disclose, and I find it unsavory that Barrick implicated a dead man to get himself off the hook.

  • smitty Jul 21, 2008

    Corruption at it's finest. The investigator's report wasn't good enough?

  • maxpower Jul 21, 2008

    "The lease agreement called for a helicopter in excellent condition, and authorities said Barrick chose to fly it despite warnings that it hadn't been properly maintained".
    The FAA calls for an aircraft to be in "airworthy condition", not excellent. No aircraft is in "excellent" condition.
    And despite warnings that it hadn't been properly maintained. Warnings from who? The aircraft logbooks tell the history of an aircraft if the mechanic has been truthful. Sounds like somebody just go tired of trying to figure this one out and said the heck with it.