Fayetteville, N.C. — A Fayetteville man convicted in a 1984 double murder will not get a new trial.
On Jan. 25, the state Supreme Court refused to consider new evidence in the case of Lee Wayne Hunt.
Hunt, 48, is serving two life sentences for the slayings of Lisa and Roland Matthews.
Despite the recent setback, Hunt's attorneys told WRAL they are not giving up.
“I'm absolutely convinced he's innocent,” UNC Law Professor Kenneth Broun said.
Hunt has always maintained his innocence.
His attorneys have said they have two new pieces of evidence to help exonerate Hunt, including the credibility of an FBI analysis that matched bullets found at the crime scene to those in a box Hunt owned. Last year, "60 Minutes" reported that scientists now believe that kind of analysis is misleading and should not be considered at trial.
It was the only physical evidence connecting Hunt to the deaths.
Hunt attorney Richard Rosen also said that the attorney for Hunt's co-defendant said his client – who committed suicide in prison – confessed to being the sole killer. Attorney Staples Hughes represented co-defendant Jerry Dale Cashwell.
Hughes, who put his law license in jeopardy by revealing the information, said Cashwell told him in 1985 that he alone killed the Matthewses. Hughes came forward after Cashwell's death.
“I think as a whole, the judicial system of North Carolina should be ashamed of their treatment of this case form top to bottom,” Rosen said.
A second defendant, Kenneth Wayne West, pleaded guilty to lesser charges in 1987 and was sentenced to three years in prison.
A fourth man involved in the case, Gene Williford Jr., was given immunity to testify against the others. He died in 2006.
The Supreme Court is the third court to reject Hunt's appeal of his 1986 conviction. In 2007, Cumberland County Superior Court Judge Jack Thompson refused to reopen the case, and the state Appeals Court did the same.
Hunt's attorneys said they will appeal the case in federal court and take it to the state's Innocence Inquiry Commission, established to investigate inmates' claims of innocence.
The state Supreme Court did not offer an explanation for its decision to not review the case.