Raleigh, N.C. — Many people are asking questions about a man accused of being a serial killer and his previous prison sentence.
Did Samuel Cooper serve enough time for his earlier crimes before he was released? Did the system fail?
Sentenced to 20 years for armed robbery, Samuel Cooper served eight years of that sentence. He also served four more years before being released because, while serving the robbery sentence, he escaped, attacked four law-enforcement officers, stole a Department of Correction van, and attacked an elderly man and stole his car.
Wake County Sheriff’s Deputy Yalanda Moore was just a few months out of the police academy when she came face to face with Samuel Cooper in the county courthouse.
“I do recall one of my first emotions being that I had to survive,” Moore said Friday.
It was eight years ago when Moore was bringing Cooper back to his holding cell.
“I unlocked his handcuff. The swivel came around, and he came up and he punched me in the jaw,” Moore said. “I was thinking I cannot let this individual take my weapon from my holster.”
“He was yanking it up,” trying to get the gun free, she said.
For that attack and attempting to escape, Samuel Cooper served an additional 14 months.
“It was surprising to me that the assault on an officer in the courthouse was a misdemeanor,” said Department of Correction spokesman Keith Acree. Cooper attacked a total of four officers while in custody, Acree said.
“One of these is an officer that got attacked in the prison library. One of these is a sergeant who was head-butted in a case manager’s office,” Acree said.
Cooper also attacked another correction officer when he escaped from a work crew and stole the officer's van. Before his capture, Cooper attacked an elderly man and stole his car as well.
Why was he released?
“He served what the law required him to serve,” Acree said, explaining that the prison system had no choice but to release Cooper.
Cooper walked out of prison last year after serving eight of the 20 years for the initial armed robbery and a total of four more years for his attacks on officers and the elderly man and for the escape.
“Is this system working? When you look at a case like this, it's hard to say it does. You would certainly think for behavior like this, you should serve more time in prison,” Acree said.
“We enforce the sentences handed down by the courts based on the laws the Legislature writes,” Acree said.
Earlier this year, lawmakers failed to pass a bill that would have upgraded the charge for assaulting a law enforcement officer.
The bill would have made any inflicted injury, not only "serious assaults," a felony. That could add a year in prison to the sentence of anyone convicted of an assault similar to Cooper's.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/share/2012/02/09/10711513/4f348e7981bb5-51x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2012/02/11/10719067/10719072-1329050037-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
As for the "democrat" or "liberal" comments. I am a conservative, and I can understand why the comments were made. "IN GENERAL" liberals and democrats are much more lenient than conservatives when it comes to crimes, sich as opposing capital punishment and so on. That doesn't not say that there are not lenient conservatives or republicians, and that there are democrats and liberals who are not lenient. It just means that "in general", they are more liberals are more lenient than conservatives.
December 3, 2007 2:14 p.m.
December 3, 2007 11:01 a.m.
I'm a reasonable person and wouldn't have a problem with any of those scenarios. When someone takes actions like he did, sometimes you have to put the highest charge on him and take it to trial if he doesn't plead. There is NO doubt in my mind that he was taking the gun for keeps. You talk about circumstantial evidence, in what circumstances would he NOT keep the gun if he got it?
December 2, 2007 12:19 p.m.
Proving things to a jury is always easy to people who've never actually had to do it. Proving intent is the hardest thing there is because intent, by definition, can only be proven by circumstantial evidence.
Sorry, but the ADA was right. Keep in mind, FIRST you have to convince the jury that the cop is telling the truth (which is getting harder and harder these days), THEN you have to prove that the criminal intended to escape with the gun or assault the officer with it.
Reasonable doubt is the highest leagal standard there is. Trying to convince juries to convict people for crimes in which a law as written was clearly intended for completely different facts is very, very difficult.
December 2, 2007 8:51 a.m.
December 2, 2007 7:43 a.m.