Local News

New Development Not So Bad in Older Neighborhoods, Some Say

Posted November 16, 2007

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— Alison Garcia and her husband recently tore down a small ranch house in Raleigh's Lyons Park neighborhood and built a 4,500-square-foot home.

"We just wanted to build a family home that was going to be in a stable neighborhood," she said.

Next door, is Clyde McDowell's much smaller, older home, where he has lived for 53 years. Unlike many other residents who live inside the Interstate 440 Beltline, he does not mind the Garcias' home.

"It makes my property value go up, considerably," he said.

Most homes within the Beltine, typically, are about 1,200 square feet. McDowell said the handful of newer and bigger homes in his neighborhood changes its dynamics, for the better.

"The income of people, today, is greater than it was when I bought this house," he said. "Therefore, they want a bigger house, particularly if they have a family."

Just how big new homes can be is something the Raleigh City Council is considering for neighborhoods citywide.

It is proposing to increase required setbacks from property lines from 5 feet to 10 feet on either side of the house and from 20 to 30 feet in the back yard and impose a maximum height on homes from 40 feet to 32 feet.

Driving the change is concern in other older neighborhoods about the so-called "McMansions," which homeowners of older residences say detract from the character of their neighborhoods.

Mayor Charles Meeker said he hopes the proposal will create a balance.

"Certainly, there are areas that need additions or houses that need to be replaced," Meeker said. "At the same time, we don't want those new houses to, really, dwarf or overshadow the existing neighborhood."

Garcia said she fears the proposed zoning regulations will scare off potential buyers.

"It scares us to think that, instead of being in a neighborhood that we can count on improving, it's going to be declining," she said.

The City Council will hold a public hearing on the zoning requirements during its next meeting Tuesday night.

There is also another proposal that would put more restrictions on new home that replaces an older home. Raleigh's city planners said that would not be debated until next month.


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • DontLikeTheSocialistObama Nov 18, 2007

    Meeker is pandering to the inside the Beltline Liberals who are against all new development and growth in Raleigh.

    These inside the Beltline Liberals tell us that we shouldn't build new homes in outlying areas of Raleigh because that creates sprawl.

    Now these inside the Beltline Liberals tell us that we can't build new houses in existing areas because it makes their rundown 50 plus year old home look even more rundown.

    These inside the Beltline Liberals are anti-growth and they are using any excuse to forward their agenda.

    These inside the Beltline Liberals want to reset Raleigh back to it's 1980 borders which were primarily inside the Beltline with the exception of North Hills.

  • jenmaris Nov 18, 2007

    That is what I am hearing all over the neighborhood. There have been a small, vocal group constantly calling the council members. It is our turn to speak up, be heard and be left alone! We have to take back our neighborhood and regain the harmony that was once here.

  • richard2 Nov 17, 2007

    There will always be people that will try to tell others how to spend their money.

  • Foster W Sikes Nov 17, 2007

    It is about time the news media showed that redevelopment of these older neighborhoods is a good thing. These types of downzoning and more restrictive set backs have caused Raleigh to sprawl out of control. We need to be lessoning the zoning regulations and encouraging redevelopment to bring families back closer to the city center.

    It is hard to believe that the mayor "who ran an anti-sprawl campaign two years ago would be behind this type of legislation.