Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

7:16 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

State Officials Sidestep Execution Debate


e-mail print friendly
Death Row, Death Penalty, Execution (Generic)
Death Row, Death Penalty, Execution (Generic)

The North Carolina Council of State on Tuesday tossed the debate over the death penalty back to the courts, saying it wasn't their place to sort out the controversial issue.

Senior Administrative Law Judge Fred Morrison Jr. in August ordered the Council of State, a nine-member panel that includes Gov. Mike Easley and other statewide elected officials, to review the protocol used in executions. But after a brief discussion Tuesday, the council voted 8-1 to send the issue to Superior Court, determining that Morrison lacked jurisdiction in the death penalty dispute.

Insurance Commissioner Jim Long cast the lone dissenting vote.

"We really shouldn't be in it," Easley said. "But we did what the Superior Court asked us to do. We're just trying to keep this in Superior Court. We're trying to stay out of it."

Morrison's ruling came in a lawsuit by some death-row inmates, who challenged the state's use of lethal injection as a violation of constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment. The judge determined that the protocol needed to be tweaked to ensure inmate's rights were protected, and he ordered that the Council of State accept input from attorneys representing death row inmates before adjusting the protocol.

"The issue we did (Tuesday) was not pro or con death penalty or prosecutions or what have you. It was a procedural matter," Secretary of State Elaine Marshall said.

The council's move upset attorneys for death-row inmates.

"It is, in fact, their job to look at this issue. So we were disappointed that essentially a procedural issue was used to avoid it," attorney Elizabeth Kuniholm said. "Someone needs to step up to the plate."

Executions have been put on hold in the state since January, when the North Carolina Medical Board adopted a policy that threatened to punish physicians for participating in executions. State law requires that a physician be present at every execution.

Superior Court Judge Donald Stephens ruled last month that the medical board overstepped its authority and ruled that the board cannot punish physicians. The state Department of Correction sued the board in March, saying no physicians were willing to help carry out an execution for fear of losing his or her medical license.

At the same time, the cocktail of drugs used in lethal injections have been questioned in North Carolina and elsewhere.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a case involving Kentucky's lethal injection procedures, and whether inmates suffer as a result. North Carolina uses the same drug combination as Kentucky.

RELATED TOPICS: Death Penalty, Supreme Court

e-mail print friendly

50 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 50 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
EVERYONE..SERIOUSLY...ASK YOURSELF THIS. DOES IT HONESTLY HURT ANYONES FEELINGS THAT SOMEONE BEING PUT TO DEATH, YES KEY WORD, PUT TO DEATH, IS GOING TO FEEL SOME BAD PAIN JUST BEFORE DYING!!!! WHO CARES!!! MAYBE THEY WILL THINK ABOUT HOW THEIR VICTIM FELT WHEN THEY SLAUGHTERED THEM!!!! KILL EM ALL AND LET GOD SORT EM OUT!

I WAS THINKING WHY WE SHOULD CONSIDER IF THE PUNISHMENT IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL,THE PEOPLE ON DEAH ROW DID NOT THINK OF THEIR VICTIMS RIGHTS WHEN THEY TOOK THEIR LIFE SO I THINK ONCE THEIR APPEAL IS DONE AND THEY ARE STILL FOUND GUILTY THAT THE SENTENCE SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT WHERE THEY WILL FEEL SOME KIND OF PAIN.USE THE SAME THING THEY USE TO PUT AN ANIMAL TO SLEEP WITH,THAT IS WHAT A LOT OF THE CONVICTED RAPIST AND KILLERS ACTED LIKE,AN ANIMAL SO GIVE THEM WHAT THEY DESERVE.

it is so true that only GOD can judge them but is up to us to arrange the meeting

I am sick and tired of criminals... violent criminals, having more rights than their innocent victims, police, and good citizens.

The more cruel and painful, the better. How else does society say, in no uncertain terms, this behavior and these crimes are completely unacceptable and will NOT be tolerated. We WILL put you to death, and it WILL hurt. End of story - if you don't want to die, don't kill.

View Comments VIEW ALL 50 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here