Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

7:36 a.m. • 5-25-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 72° F
  • Sun: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 75° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 80° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2007-08-28 17:32:00
Updated: 2007-08-28 18:05:23

Wake Schools to Pursue Controversial Rolesville Site


print friendly

Dismissing the conclusions of two independent appraisals, the Wake County school board voted Tuesday to pursue a controversial land deal in Rolesville.

Wake County commissioners delayed approving the purchase of 47 acres in Rolesville for a middle school last month, saying the school district was paying too much for the land.

Proposed school-site purchases in Apex and Cary in recent months that were deemed overvalued prompted the county Board of Commissioners to require the district to obtain an independent appraisal on all future land deals before the commissioners would consider approving the purchase.

A first appraisal on the Rolesville site valued the land at about $48,000 an acre, while a second appraisal put the value at $63,000 to $65,000 an acre. The school district has offered $75,000 an acre.

School board members said passing on the deal could push back the opening date on the middle school by a year and add to the construction cost. Finding another suitable site could take six months, and inflation could drive up the price of building the school by as much as $1.9 million, they said.

The middle school is scheduled to open in 2010, but a delay could push it back to 2011.

The owners of the 47-acre site has told the school board that they have a back-up offer and won't extend the school system's option on the land beyond Sept. 6.

The school board voted to take the deal to the Board of Commissioners for approval.

Meanwhile, the school board met with the Raleigh City Council Tuesday to discuss ways to ensure adequate school sites will remain available in the future.

Wake County loses an acre of open space every hour to new development, and the school board plans to meet with officials in each of the county's 12 municipalities so they are familiar with the school district's process for siting new schools.

School board member Carol Parker said she would like to talk about developers and communities setting aside land for future schools.

"Communication is obviously going to be a very important item going forward, whether it's us or the other municipalities or the county. Communication is going to be key in how the school board communicates with everybody else," Raleigh City Councilman Philip Isley said.


13 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 13 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Neat job: I want it. Things that would be on my Dire Consequences list are: * Turning off the A/C and heat in the buildings * turning the bathrooms into classrooms - installing porta-potties on the football field * School lunch vegetables will have to be purchased from China, even though they will be shipped in lead cartons * Hold our breath until we turn blue.

Are these guys real?

Ah, brinksmanship....

I wonder who at the Wake County School Board is in charge of the Dire Consequences department? What's his or her job description? "Develop a list of the most most public and indigestible consequences that we can use for the crisis de jour. Scenarios must inconvenience the most people in the most public manner (e.g. no school choice, no parking, no sports, no diversity). The list shall not include any items that might inconvenience the School Board (i.e. spending money wisely, making logical and businesslike decisions, cutting bloat and mismanagement). Job performance is directly linked to the number of hysterical letters to the editor supporting the School Board's plan."

"Research shows over and over that economic segregation in schools hurts kids from low incomes, while economic integration helps these students and does not impair students from better-off backgrounds." - Durham-Raleigh

100% wrong. "Economic Integration", the euphemism for desegregation busing has been and will continue to be a complete and utter failure.

Another thought - although "economic integration" may not impair students from "better off backgrounds", by your own logic it would certainly not afford those students capable of more rapid or higher academic achievement the opportunities to do so. For example, my daughter reads far above her grade level. Instead of being given opportunities to advance academically, she is kept in the classroom to read to and tutor students who have not achieved as much academically. By your definition, those students would primarily come from lower income" families. If we operate under the premise that all children can learn, then there must be other factors at work here such as individual motivation, parental involvement, etc. Those factors cannot and should not be addressed through forced "economic integration".

Sorry, D-R, meant to say "with" all due respect...

View Comments VIEW ALL 13 COMMENTS