Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

6:59 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Duke Defense Asks Court to Note Evidence Withheld


e-mail print friendly
Duke Lacrosse Lawyers File Motion
Duke Lacrosse Lawyers File Motion
The Duke lacrosse case has been handed over to a special prosecutor, but the defense is still on the attack, asking the court Tuesday to take special note of the prosecution's not having turned over DNA evidence that the defense says shows their clients are innocent.

In a motion, the lawyers told the court that  results from 11 of 22 tests done on samples from a rape kit taken from the victim the night of the alleged crime were not provided until January.

The defense wants that information in the court record for certain, they said.

The rape kit was taken at Duke Hospital the morning of March 14, 2006, the morning after a lacrosse team party at which a woman hired as a stripper claimed she was attacked in a bathroom.

Collin Finnerty, David Evans and Reade Seligmann are charged with sexual assault and kidnapping. They had been charged with rape as well, but Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong dropped those charges in December after the woman’s story wavered, his office said then.

Nifong recused himself from the case in January and it has since been turned over to special prosecutors in the state Attorney General's office.

In the motion, defense attorneys did not blame the special prosecutors for the issues, saying they had no direct knowledge of evidence being withheld.

On May 12, 2006, DNA Security, a private laboratory in Burlington, reported the results of one of 22 tests.

The defense then filed a motion asking for the remaining tests, citing evidence that that the DNA of multiple males was found on the victim's body and that it did not match that in samples given by any of the defendants or their lacrosse teammates.

On Jan. 9, Dr. Brian Meehan from DNA Security gave the defense attorneys an amended report, saying it was the complete file.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham

e-mail print friendly

18 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 18 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
The accuser nor DA Nifong can't keep their lies straight... And it is those lies that will land them sharing a jail cell.It seems that they were made for each other.

This is still being prosecuted because, even though none of the evidence points to anything, someone is going to have to go down for something. The woman lied, it was proven she lied, but that doesn't matter to "The Community" they want something out of this fiasco. I'll be surprised if they don't riot.

Hey Happyday. I was a stripper and I still frequent strip clubs with my husband - often. I STILL THINK SHE IS LYING - HENCE MUTIPLE STORY CHANGES. The defense has and had the right to these tests the minute she accused their clients. If not how could there ever be a fair trial. It is called withholding evidence. No one can choose what evidence they wish to enter. She may be a victim - but only in life and it has nothing to do with this case or these people. This is not a judgement, but a obvious conclusion. Furthermore what woman - who was raped - would have sex with others evidently after - and get pregnant one month after the fact? It doesn't add up and it never did. The prosecution botched this one up even before it began.

Personally, I don't think that if I had been ganged rape by 3 people at one time that I would want to have sex again. I'm sorry for this woman who had no other resources she could turn to other than becoming an exotic dancer. BUT she alleges she was raped and then 9 or 10 months later, has a baby? Come on! When are the prosecutors going to get a clue?

Can someone from WRAL explain why an approver is required on some stories and not others?

View Comments VIEW ALL 18 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here