Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

9:51 a.m. • 5-22-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2012-08-10 07:24:00
Updated: 2012-08-10 18:49:32

Judge: Peterson must keep monitor bracelet on ankle


Mike Peterson in court
Mike Peterson in court
print friendly

A Superior Court judge ordered Friday that Durham novelist and one-time mayoral candidate Mike Peterson must continue wearing an electronic monitoring bracelet while awaiting a new trial in the death of his wife.

Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder in the Dec. 9, 2001, death of his wife. Kathleen Peterson was found dead in a pool of blood at the bottom of a staircase in the couple's upscale Durham home.

Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson ruled last December that a key prosecution witness in Peterson's 2003 murder trial gave false and misleading testimony, and he ordered Peterson released on $300,000 bond pending a retrial.

The state has appealed Hudson's ruling.

Since his release, Peterson has been under house arrest in Durham and is required to wear an ankle bracelet to keep track of his whereabouts.

He filed a motion last month asking for the conditions of his bond to be relaxed so he could ditch the bracelet and move about more freely. He says he suffers from sciatica, which makes wearing the bracelet painful.

"Keeping this on this particular person – I don't know if it's appropriate for every defendant out there or any defendant out there – but on this particular person, is inappropriate because it's cruel," defense attorney Kerry Sutton argued.

Christi Long, pre-trial services supervisor for Durham County, said that the monitor had been moved from one leg to the other after Peterson complained of pain. She noted that he had previous problems with his legs unrelated to the monitor.

Sutton also said that Peterson isn't a flight risk because his bond is secured by his son's home and other family property.

"He is not in any way going to risk the home of his grandchildren and live a life of flight the rest of his days," she said.

Judge Michael O'Foghludha ruled, however, that there was no evidence that the monitoring bracelet caused a July 11 trip by Peterson to a local emergency room, where he was treated for leg pain.

Peterson said after the hearing that he was disappointed by the ruling, but he and Sutton said they would put together more medical documentation and seek another court hearing.

Durham County Assistant District Attorney Roger Echols said that Peterson already has been given a low bond for a murder case, and the other bond conditions need to remain in place to ensure public safety and that he doesn't flee the area.

Kathleen Peterson's two sisters asked O'Foghludha to return their former brother-in-law to jail if he couldn't wear the ankle monitor.

"He's a proven danger to my family," Lori Campell said, adding that she feels unsafe because Peterson blames his in-laws for his legal troubles. "Michael's reasons for fleeing are increasing, not decreasing. If anything, he should be more closely monitored."

Candace Zamperini said Peterson threatened her in a French documentary made about the case several years ago. She became so upset that she started yelling at Peterson from the witness stand, and O'Foghludha had to tell her to lower her voice.

"You think that ankle bracelet is enough when he tries to intimidate me by film?" Zamperini said in court. "I'd like to feel safe."


131 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 131 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
waste of time and money, he should be in jail. no new trial, no breaks for the guilty.

If that ankle bracelet is TOO painful, he can opt to return to prison

Wearing an electronic monitoring device for more than 3 years is likely to be considered excessive punishment at the end of the day. He has been convicted of nothing. For the person who fell down the stairs and lived to tell about it.......good for you. Many others have not. Walking down those stairs must have made you a psychic and I have a very good understanding of how the justice system works and how it doesn't work in Durham. He likely doesn't have a medical reason to have that bracelet removed. He did however expose massive corruption in Durham......when his wife fell he didn't stand a chance. Learn your history. Also, Orlando Hudson didn't make this determination. The other cases are relevant b/c it exposes just a couple of other cases where the nuts "just knew he did it". Losing your life when you are innocent is unspeakable. charmcclainlovesdogs2-- I wear my medals proudly! I gave my leg, spleen and half my liver to protect your right to be rude!

Trial court judges are given less latitude under the Excessive Bail Clause. Bail is the amount of money, property, or bond that a defendant must pledge to the court as security for his or her appearance at trial. If the defendant meets bail or is able to pay the amount set by the court, the defendant is entitled to recover the pledged amount at the conclusion of the criminal proceedings. However, if the defendant fails to appear as scheduled during the prosecution, then he or she forfeits the amount pledged and still faces further criminal penalties if convicted of the offense or offenses charged. When fixing the amount of bail for a particular defendant, the court takes into consideration several factors: (1) the seriousness of the offense; (2) the Weight of Evidence against the accused; (3) the nature and extent of any ties, such as family or employment, that the accused has to the community where he or she will be prosecuted; (4) the accused's ability to pay a given amount;

Seriously? How many more tax dollars is this man going to be allowed to waste. Electronic monitoring devices are NOT painful unless they are too tight. This is ridiculous and needs to stop immediately.

View Comments VIEW ALL 131 COMMENTS