Durham, N.C. — Former Vice President Al Gore shared his thoughts on environmental issues Thursday night during the 2010 spring Duke Environment and Society Lecture.
The 1,200 seats at the auditorium quickly filled, but the speech was also shown on closed-circuit television to those in overflow seating.
Solar, wind and geothermal energy are the answers to fixing the climate crisis, Gore said.
Gore shared in the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his advocacy of environmental causes. “An Inconvenient Truth,” a documentary on Gore’s environmental campaign, won two Academy Awards in 2007.
Some agreed with Gore's message that global warming will drastically change life on Earth.
"There are signs pointing to that, that we only have a finite amount of time to continue on the direction we are going," graduate student Harry Jones said.
Others were not supportive of Gore's message. A handful of protesters gathered nearby the auditorium.
"You are giving Al Gore a venue to promote his film and his notoriety without any chance of debate," said David Degerolamo, of the group NCFreedom.
Protesters said the data Gore uses to make his points have been disproven. They also argued that proposed fixes for global warming would be costly.
"I despise what Al Gore is doing. He is enriching himself at the expense of poor people," said Hans Mentha, with NCFreedom.
Members of the media were allowed to record video and audio of only the first five minutes of Gore's talk at the Page Auditorium on Duke University's West Campus. Photography was also limited.
Gore spokeswoman Kalee Kreider said Tuesday the restrictions are standard for his talks, but she wouldn't say why they were in place.



![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/politics/2007/02/06/1195254/1296152831-_NCCapitol_800x600-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/movies/2007/12/29/2229920/2229920-1208172047-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/2008/06/05/3000786/swimming_pool-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/goaskmom/2011/04/28/9516059/9516069-1304016629-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/house_and_home/2008/07/27/3287725/Blueberries-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)





WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
April 9, 2010 3:34 p.m.
There is plenty of bias on both sides of the debate, however scientists are held to a much higher standard than politicians. As I stated before, the scientific method is there for a reason- much of that reason is to keep personal bias out of the picture. The point of science is to be objective, not to follow some hidden agenda.
Global warming deniers pay their own scientists too, but they have not presented evidence with would overwhelmingly negate the currently accepted theory. Climate scientists are not out to protect their income (they can easily get just as much or more money from global warming opponents), they are just there to make obsevations about a very real problem. Let the politicians duke it out on what to do about that problem, and stop trying to discredit the scientists, who for all intensive purposes have a very high ethical st
April 9, 2010 2:43 p.m.
This cost increases due to off-shore drilling are passed directly to the consumer, and US based oil companies will increase their market share (and thus profits) due to increased availablity of resources.
Far reaching use of energy-efficient and alternative fuel technologies will reduce the global demand for oil, thus reducing their profits. There are two choices here -- oppose or delay the new technolgies, or attempt to pursue them and gain a foothold in the market. Oil companies seem to be doing a bit of both, but they still need to protect their cash cow.
April 9, 2010 2:18 p.m.
Why does anyone who attended or graduated from UNC automatically "liberal"? A friend of mine graduated from UNC and she said it is about 50/50 among Conservatives and Democrats. Just look at all the Christian groups you can join there. UNC's one atheist group does not even have enough members so it cease to exist. UNC just had an anti-immigrant group called Youth for Western Civilization, a national organization with direct ties to hate groups and white nationalist websites. They are the group that invited former Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo.
Click on "religious" then "search" on link below http://cf.unc.edu/dsa/union/studorgs/search.cfm
April 9, 2010 2:08 p.m.
April 9, 2010 1:53 p.m.