Last-ditch effort to avoid fiscal cliff under way

Posted December 28, 2012

— The end game at hand, the White House and Senate leaders launched a final attempt at compromise Friday night in hopes of preventing a toxic blend of middle-class tax increases and spending cuts from taking effect at the turn of the new year.

"I am hopeful and optimistic" of reaching an agreement after months of gridlock, the Senate Republican Leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said after a meeting with President Barack Obama and top congressional leaders at the White House.

He said he hoped for a compromise that could be presented to rank-and-file lawmakers by Sunday, little more than 24 hours before the year-end deadline.

Said Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "I'm going to do everything I can" to prevent the tax increases and spending cuts that threaten to send the economy into recession. He cautioned, "Whatever we come up with is going to be imperfect."

In a brief statement to reporters Friday evening, Obama called his hour-long meeting with congressional leaders "good and constructive" and said "the hour for immediate action is here" on a deal to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff."

The president said he remains "optimistic" that an agreement can be reached in Congress. If not, he said, he wants a vote on a basic package that would preserve tax cuts for middle-class Americans while extending unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless and working toward a foundation for a broader deal.

Success was far from guaranteed in an atmosphere of political mistrust – even on a slimmed-down deal that postponed hard decisions about spending cuts into 2013 – in a Capitol where lawmakers grumbled about the likelihood of spending the new year holiday in the Capitol.

"The clock is ticking," Sen. Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said in remarks on the Senate floor as Obama and congressional leaders were meeting several blocks away at the White House. "My message to them is simple. We can do this. We can get this done, and we must," added the Montana Democrat.

Congressional Democrats said Obama was ready with a revised offer to present.

But that drew a denial from a person familiar with the talks, who said the president would review his proposal from a week ago, when he urged lawmakers to preserve tax cuts for most while letting rates rise above incomes of $250,000 a year. At the same time, Obama said lawmakers should extend unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless. The person was unauthorized to discuss the private meeting publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

The guest list included two Republicans, House Speaker John Boehner, and McConnell; as well as Democrats Reid and Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, her party's leader in the House.

The same group last met more than a month ago and emerged expressing optimism they could strike a deal that avoided the fiscal cliff. At that point, Boehner had already said he was willing to let tax revenues rise as part of an agreement, and the president and his Democratic allies said they were ready to accept spending cuts.

Since then, though, talks between Obama and Boehner faltered, the speaker struggled to control his rebellious rank and file and Reid and McConnell sparred almost daily in speeches on the Senate floor. Through it all, Wall Street has paid close attention, and in the moments before the meeting, stocks were trading lower for the fifth day in a row.

U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan Hagan hopeful for last-minute 'cliff' deal

Democratic U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina said more than 3 million families would be hurt immediately by the spending cuts and tax increases, so she is holding out hope for a deal.

"There are a number of us who want to move forward, come together and do what's right," Hagan said. "The fiscal cliff is not beneficial to the people of North Carolina."

Her Republican counterpart, U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, said the issue is broader that simply avoiding the fiscal cliff, noting that fundamental changes to the federal tax code and entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare are needed.

"We are in this position because our economy is in a very dangerous place. We are spending more than we are bringing in every year, our national debt is over $16 trillion and climbing and Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are in jeopardy of going bankrupt," Burr said in a statement.

The core issue is the same as it has been for more than a year, Obama's demand for tax rates to rise on upper incomes while remaining at current levels for most Americans. He made the proposal central to his successful campaign for re-election, when he said incomes above $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples should rise to 39.6 percent from the current 35 percent.

Boehner refused for weeks to accept any rate increases, and simultaneously accused Obama of skimping on the spending cuts he would support as part of a balanced deal to reduce deficits, remove the threat of spending cuts and prevent the across-the-board tax cuts.

Last week, the Ohio Republican pivoted and presented a Plan B measure that would have let rates rise on million-dollar earners. That was well above Obama's latest offer, which called for a $400,000 threshold, but more than the speaker's rank and file were willing to accept.

Facing defeat, Boehner scrapped plans for a vote, leaving the economy on track for the cliff that political leaders in both parties had said they could avoid. In the aftermath, Democrats said they doubted any compromise was possible until Boehner has been elected to a second term as speaker when the new Congress convenes on Jan. 3.

Apart from income tax rates, congressional officials in both parties said a handful of other issues were the subject of private talks in the Capitol. These included the Alternative Minimum Tax, which would effectively raise taxes on millions of upper-middle-class families unless Congress acts; as well as taxes on capital gains, dividends and estates.

In addition, benefits for the long-term unemployed are due to expire in the next few days, and doctors face the prospect of a deep cut in the fees they receive for treating Medicare patients unless legislation is passed to prevent it.

Further compounding the year-end maneuvering, there are warnings that the price of milk could virtually double beginning next year.

Congressional officials said that under current law, the federal government is obligated to maintain prices so that fluid milk sells for about $20 per hundredweight. If the law lapses, the Department of Agriculture would be required to maintain a price closer to $36 of $38 per hundredweight, they said. It is unclear when price increases might be felt by consumers.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • tatermommy52 Dec 28, 2012

    Romney would have provided the leadership we are missing.

  • hmmmmm Dec 28, 2012

    Nothing but a bunch of losers playing brinkmanship games, impeach them all & get some real people in there who WANT to work for our country AND their pay. A single parent could clean up our budget mess real quick! Pay them a salary to look through all the "bills" passed & highlight all the areas of wasteful spending. I am sure they can find lots of ways to balance the budget, clean up our deficit,provide healthcare to all our citizens AND lower taxes.

  • WooHoo2You Dec 28, 2012

    I'm so glad the GOP decided to completely stop all talks regarding a budget deal to work on "Plan B" that they themselves did not even bring up for a vote....but thats what they call "compromise" and those mean old democrats are the ones holding up progress.

  • wbarrett92 Dec 28, 2012

    Wait a minute now!! Social Security is not an entitlement to me. I've paid into SS for YEARS.

    So has every babyboomer and those after. However, when the bulk of the boomers retire we all will be in a downward boom that most will not understand.

  • paultaylorsr100 Dec 28, 2012

    You're out of you mind!!!

  • welfarequeen Dec 28, 2012

    See what these crazy Tea Pot nitwits have done to our country!

  • junkmail5 Dec 28, 2012

    Social Security is not an entitlement to me. I've paid into SS for YEARS.

    How it is funded has nothing to do with it being an entitlement or not.

    Social Security is absolutely an entitlement if you go by the actual definition of the word.

  • Tax Man Dec 28, 2012

    For 2013 just set the tax rate at zero for everyone. Divide the national debt, including social security and medicare liabilities, by the total number of adults in the US and charge each one their equal share for 2013 due and payable in monthly installments until paid by 12/31/2013. If you do not pay the full tax owed then you become a government slave and must do a job that the government needs you to do whether it be street sweeping, toilet cleaning, painting etc. No more welfare, no more food stamps, no more unemployment. If you cannot pay your fair share of the amount Congress has burdened you with by December 31, 2013 then you must work for the government all of 2014! In 2014 use the FairTax and charge every single living American a consumption tax based on what they spend! That way we pay off the entire debt and get a fair way to collect taxes and eliminate the things that cost us so much money.

  • paultaylorsr100 Dec 28, 2012

    Wait a minute now!! Social Security is not an entitlement to me. I've paid into SS for YEARS.

  • wbarrett92 Dec 28, 2012

    ConservativeVoter in my opinion
    I don't think you can exclude Social Security and Medicare.