Local News

Conviction upheld under NC video sweepstakes ban

Posted April 17, 2015

Pre-reveal screen on video sweepstakes machine
Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— The state Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear an appeal by two people arrested two years ago for violating North Carolina's ban on video sweepstakes machines.

Attorney General Roy Cooper said the case was the first sweepstakes-related conviction to make it to the Supreme Court, and the justices' decision to leave the Court of Appeals ruling intact means the state ban on the game remains the law of the land.

The case stemmed from the April 2013 arrests of Richard Conoley Chapman and Kawana Spruill, the owner and manager, respectively, of a Tabor City business where people could play sweepstakes games.

State lawmakers banned such games in 2010, and the Supreme Court upheld the ban two years later. Still, game makers adjusted their software, arguing that revealing prizes upfront and allowing people to then play games was legal under state law. Some local district attorneys cracked down on sweepstakes parlors, while others waited for the courts to clarify what was legal and what wasn't.

“We’ve seen time and again that video gambling leads to corruption and crime, and that’s why I’ve long stood with law enforcement against it," Cooper said in a statement. "Today’s action by the court makes it clear that North Carolina officers and prosecutors have authority to go after illegal gambling operations in their communities.”


Please with your WRAL.com account to comment on this story. You also will need a Facebook account to comment.

Oldest First
View all
  • Wayne Boyd Apr 17, 2015
    user avatar

    ''We've seen time and again that video gambling leads to corruption and crime......Please tell me the difference between putting a ten dollar bill into a poker machine and buying a $10.00 lottery ticket.
    I admit I've played the machines and the odds are far greater in my favor of winning than they are playing the lottery.
    In my opinion the state sees reduced revenue as far as their portion is concerned and they don't want ANY competition.

  • Alexia Proper Apr 17, 2015
    user avatar

    The article said the manager of the business was arrested. Did the manager just follow instructions, or was it the manager who was violating the law. This seems odd.

    And I think Roy Cooper "standing with law enforcement" is a silly thing to say. Law enforcement just enforces the laws, as does his office. Of course, his office would prosecute offenders, too.

    I don't fully agree that gambling brings about crime. Maybe stats say otherwise, but if its true we need to shut down that lottery ASAP!

  • Brian Hill Apr 17, 2015
    user avatar

    The only crime here is the act of kidnapping, grand larceny and breaking and entering by the state in an attempt to eliminate competition.