Local News

Abaroa murder trial closing arguments set for Wednesday

Posted May 28, 2013
Updated May 29, 2013

— Closing arguments have been scheduled for Wednesday morning in the trial of Raven Abaroa, accused of fatally stabbing his wife in their Durham home more than eight years ago.

Prosecutors on Tuesday called three rebuttal witnesses, including an ex-boyfriend of 25-year-old Janet Marie Christiansen Abaroa who had been involved in a flirtatious email exchange with her weeks before her April 26, 2005, death.

Raven Abaroa, 33, has maintained that he is innocent of the first-degree murder charge that could send him to prison for the rest of his life if he is convicted.

Defense attorneys wrapped up their case last week after four days of testimony that centered on repairing what they have called a dishonest portrait of their client and the relationship he had with his wife.

Scott Hall's testimony Tuesday was in response to emails between him and Janet Abaroa that were discovered less than two weeks ago on a computer hard drive.

The messages, dated in March and April 2005, talked about the two meeting in Virginia – an encounter that never happened, Hall said, because the messages were just the two of them being "flirty" and joking around.

Raven Abaroa's defense has said the emails show a different image of Janet Abaroa, whom prosecutors painted as a broken woman who feared her verbally abusive and controlling husband.

Hall, on cross-examination, said Janet Abaroa never gave him any indication that there was trouble in her marriage and that she actually talked about how Raven Abaroa was someone she trusted and could talk to about anything.

In fact, defense attorneys pointed out, Hall told investigators in 2005 that Janet Abaroa always put her husband in a favorable light.

"She did," he said. "I would hear, at least after her death, different than that. The only thing I could assume was that she was embarrassed that her relationship wasn't going well."

When prompted by the defense, however, Hall admitted that what Janet Abaroa said about her husband could have been true but that he thought if she had been truly happy, she would have mentioned him in a conversation they had had about all the things she was grateful for in her life.

Hall and Janet Abaroa dated for about three years in high school, he said, but they broke up when she went off to college. They lost touch but reconnected in 2003 over dinner with mutual friends at TGI Friday's.

The dinner, he said, was the last time he saw her until her funeral. He was at home in Virginia on April 26, 2005, with back problems, he said.

Raven Abaroa has said he found his wife dead in an upstairs office of their home on Ferrand Drive when he returned home around 10:40 p.m. from playing in a soccer match.

An autopsy found she had been stabbed three times, including a fatal wound to the neck, and was in the very-early stage of pregnancy.

Testimony in Raven Abaroa's trial lasted 19 days with prosecutors calling 66 witnesses over 14 days before resting their case last Monday. Defense attorneys called 17.

Jurors on Tuesday also looked at records of the couple's bank accounts and heard from witnesses about a laptop docking station that was never seized from the couple's home.

The state hasn't offered a clear motive for jurors but has provided evidence that the couple was struggling financially and that Raven Abaroa had been convicted of embezzling, had several extramarital encounters with other women and was verbally and physically abusive toward his second wife.

The defense contends that police focused only Raven Abaroa for mistakes he had made in his life and ignored evidence that could have cleared him.

That includes unknown DNA in a blood stain on a door, an unknown finger print on a closet door, a bloody shoeprint by Janet Abaroa's body and two dozen reports of suspicious activity in the neighborhood in the weeks prior to the death.

5 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • observantone18 May 28, 7:48 p.m.

    Actually, the trial is in Durham. And there has been plenty of evidence towards motive, means and opportunity. The missing murder weapon, the laptop (which the defendant backed up the night before the victim's murder) and the shirt the defendant was wearing when the alleged murder was committed. However, defendant got a little lazy - backed up laptop CD was found by a member of victim's family and turned over to LE. Some very sad and incriminating things were on that backed up laptop CD. Also, today was interesting, as testimony provided by defendant (under oath) at a pre-trial hearing in October, 2012, showed numerous lies stated by the defendant. Too many lies by defendant, bank records show he was broke, couldn't get a job b/c he was a convicted felon for embezzlement, no sign of break-in at the house, crime scene very low-key for such a violent crime. Only person that stood to benefit from the death of the victim is the defendant - to the tune of $500K from her LI policy.

  • kweb1013 May 28, 5:09 p.m.

    too bad RA, like JY and BC can not get a fair trial in Raleigh. How about getting some real evidence.

  • datenobunaga2 May 28, 4:18 p.m.

    So, the courts hand out Cliff Notes to Jurors? Is there no standard procedure for instructing the jury. I am having a real OMG moment watching the discussion on the summary to be handed to the jury. I agree with the defense that everything the judge will read to them is completely one sided.If they were simply going to hand them a summary, then why even have them sit there for the whole duration of the trial. OMG We are so doomed as far as our justice system is concerned.

  • momx4 May 28, 3:42 p.m.

    Too bad the jury didn't get to see the myspace video where Raven was showing off the huge knife he got himself for Christmas - with Janet sitting beside him.

  • valleyGirl May 28, 3:33 p.m.

    I believe the investigators focused on RA because the evidence indicated such. You have to investigate where the evidence leads you. You also need to consider alternatives, but this is a trial of the accused.