Business

White House Must Restore Press Credentials for CNN’s Jim Acosta, Judge Rules

Posted November 16, 2018 11:49 a.m. EST
Updated November 16, 2018 11:54 a.m. EST

FILE-- CNN reporter Jim Acosta waits for the microphone during a contentious news conference with President Donald Trump about the results of the midterm elections, at the White House in Washington, Nov. 7, 2018. A federal judge on Nov. 16 directed the White House to restore the press credentials of Acosta, a win for media advocates and news organizations in a major legal test of press rights under Trump. The revocation of. Acosta’s press badge, which grants access to the White House grounds, came after the testy exchange with Trump. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)

A federal judge on Friday directed the White House to restore the press credentials of Jim Acosta of CNN, a win for media advocates and news organizations in a major legal test of press rights under President Donald Trump.

The judge, Timothy J. Kelly of U.S. District Court in Washington, ruled that the Trump administration had most likely violated Acosta’s due process rights when it revoked his press badge after a testy exchange with the president at a news conference last week.

The ruling was a significant but narrow victory for CNN. Kelly, who was appointed by Trump, declined to weigh in on the First Amendment issues cited by the network, and the White House has the right to appeal. For now, Acosta can resume working on the White House grounds.

“I want to emphasize the very limited nature of this ruling,” the judge said from the bench. “I have not determined that the First Amendment was violated here.”

Kelly’s decision came in response to CNN’s request for an emergency order restoring Acosta’s credentials. The lawsuit, which the network filed this week, remains active, and other legal issues raised in the case were expected to be addressed in later court sessions.

Acosta, CNN’s chief White House correspondent, rose to prominence in large part because of his public jousts with Trump. The conflict between the reporter and the White House had grown into a legal showdown over journalists’ ability to cover a president who regularly denigrates their work as “fake news.”

Friday’s ruling was hailed by CNN and free speech advocates as a victory for journalism.

“Today’s decision reaffirms that no one, not even the president, is above the law,” the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement.

CNN had argued that the White House had violated Acosta’s free speech and due process rights, citing a case from the 1970s that required the White House to demonstrate a clear process, and right of appeal, before revoking a reporter’s credentials. Kelly said the Trump administration had been unable to articulate the process that led to stripping Acosta of his press pass.

The administration contended that presidents enjoy broad discretion to bar journalists from the White House, and that Acosta’s barbed questioning and refusal to yield his microphone at the contentious conference in the East Room on Nov. 7 was boorish and disrespectful.

Acosta, who attended the hearing and showed no emotion when the ruling was announced, thanked the judge afterward.

“Let’s go back to work,” he told reporters outside the courthouse.

The case, CNN v. Donald J. Trump, had come to symbolize the dysfunctional dynamic between Trump and the White House press corps.

It also revealed that much of the interaction between presidents and the press is based on custom, rather than any kind of legal framework. Reporters have had access to the White House for decades, but the mechanics of the tradition have rarely been enshrined in law.

“The relationship between the White House and the beginnings of the press corps came about as a matter of mutual convenience, not as a matter of legal grounding,” said Stephen Ponder, a media historian who has written on reporters in the White House.

No president relishes being scrutinized by the news media, and administrations have long relied on subtle and not-so-subtle methods to ice out reporters they considered troublesome by, for instance, ignoring their questions at briefings or giving scoops to their competitors.

Advocacy groups said that stripping a correspondent’s credentials entered the realm of retaliation, and posed a threat to basic press freedoms.

For Trump and his supporters, penalizing Acosta was a surefire crowd-pleaser. The president’s political team released a fundraising email touting CNN’s lawsuit as evidence that the news media was intent on hurting the administration. White House allies like Sean Hannity of Fox News have denounced Acosta as a biased grandstander.

Other presidents have expressed animus toward reporters in memorable ways. In 1942, Franklin D. Roosevelt handed out a Nazi Iron Cross at a news conference and asked that it be bestowed on one of his least loved chroniclers, a columnist at The Daily News of New York.