Trump Claims Election Night Credit. It’s Not That Simple.

WASHINGTON — In President Donald Trump’s mind, he has become the indispensable man, the political force singularly responsible for the narrow lead that Troy Balderson, the Republican candidate, clings to in a heavily conservative Ohio House district and that Kris Kobach maintains in the Kansas governor’s primary.

But the presidential braggadocio that followed Tuesday’s election night squeakers ignores another reality that the White House is loath to acknowledge: Trump — and his chaotic, controversy-laden tenure in the Oval Office — is largely responsible for the toxic political climate that is undermining the Republican candidates he is trying to save.

Economic growth topped 4 percent earlier this year. Unemployment is low; stock prices are high. Yet Republicans speak darkly of the awful environment their candidates face in midterm elections 90 days away.

“Trump injects a certain level of uncertainty and chaos into these races,” said Kevin Madden, a veteran Republican strategist who was a top adviser to Mitt Romney, the party’s 2012 presidential nominee. “There is no doubt that Trump is actually increasing Democrat turnout.”

The president appears to exist in a sunny political environment all his own. In a late-night tweet on Tuesday, Trump bragged about “a big turn for the better” in Balderson’s campaign after the president held a boisterous get-out-the-vote rally in Ohio on Saturday night. On Wednesday morning, he crowed that Republicans went “5 for 5” in races on Tuesday and predicted that whenever he campaigns for candidates, “they will win!”

“As long as I campaign and/or support Senate and House candidates (within reason), they will win! I LOVE the people, & they certainly seem to like the job I’m doing. If I find the time, in between China, Iran, the Economy and much more, which I must, we will have a giant Red Wave!” he boasted Wednesday on Twitter.

It is impossible to know for sure the impact of Trump’s last-minute help in an Ohio district that Republicans should have won easily. The president could be right that he lifted turnout among Balderson’s supporters just enough to secure the win, if and when it is declared. Or it’s possible that his rally did nothing much — polls ahead of election day suggested a 1-point race, which is about where it ended up.

Nor is it possible to gauge the impact of a late-tweeted endorsement of Kobach, the divisive Kansas secretary of state who headed the president’s voter integrity commission before challenging the sitting Republican governor.

The president’s political advisers said internal polling in Balderson’s race showed him trailing, and turned around only after Vice President Mike Pence visited and the president held the last-minute rally. They noted that far more Democrats were voting early than Republicans in Ohio until those White House visits.

But Republican and Democratic strategists alike said Trump’s low approval ratings and his lack of a disciplined message about the booming economy had harmed Republican candidates in general this year.

In recent weeks, Trump has escalated trade wars with China and the United States’ European allies, complained repeatedly about the investigation into Russian election interference, caused a border crisis by separating migrant families, attacked the NBA’s most popular star and praised President Vladimir Putin of Russia.

Frank Luntz, a longtime Republican pollster, said the president was “unmistakably the most powerful, influential person” among his loyal supporters. He can make a difference in close races by generating enthusiasm in his political base ahead of election day.

But Luntz said that scores of Republican candidates are facing a disastrous election season in which independent voters are leaning heavily toward the Democratic Party and away from Trump — and Democrats are at least as energized by Trump’s involvement as Republicans. He said the president was fooling himself if he thought the Balderson race in Ohio, which remained too close to call on Wednesday, was a victory for the party.

“That district has been Republican in 48 out of 50 years,” Luntz said. “That’s not a wake-up call. That’s a hit in the head with a baseball bat.”

That is a point Democrats hammered home Wednesday.

“Last night proved Democrats can close the gap anywhere, even in the reddest districts,” said Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee. “If we’re keeping it this close in this district now, it’s a good sign for our chances across the country this November.”

The president — no surprise — sees it differently.

In his day-after tweets, Trump assailed what he called the “Fake News Media” for refusing to give him credit for a successful season of special elections and primaries. If you listened to the press, he said, “you would think we are being clobbered.”

“Why can’t they play it straight, so unfair to the Republican Party and in particular, your favorite President!” he continued.

The president also claimed that his popularity with “the people” would help the Republican Party in the fall. In fact, Trump’s overall approval rating — which has hovered in the low 40 percent range for months — is among the worst of the last nine presidents for this point in his tenure. His Gallup poll disapproval rating, at around 54 percent, is considerably higher than Barack Obama’s 48 percent in the August ahead of the Democrats’ 2010 shellacking, although it is slightly lower than George W. Bush’s ahead of the 2006 midterms, when the Democrats took control of Congress.

John McLaughlin, who was Trump’s campaign pollster and still does polling work for the White House, said Republican candidates needed to do more than just invite the president for a last-minute rally. He said they needed to more fully embrace the president’s agenda if they wanted to win. McLaughlin noted that more than 205,000 people who live in Balderson’s district voted for Trump in 2016 — more than twice the number of Republicans who voted for Balderson on Tuesday. McLaughlin calls the difference the Trump Voter Deficit.

“Trump basically bailed out the GOP establishment. They were losing until he got into the race,” McLaughlin said. He said Republican leaders in Washington had done too much to resist Trump’s policies on trade, immigration and the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

“You need to act,” McLaughlin said. “You need to pass his agenda. You need to fight for his agenda.”

But many strategists say it is not that simple. While he remains exceedingly popular among self-described Republicans, that universe is shrinking, and Trump is making choices that complicate the party’s overall hopes of remaining in the majority after November’s elections. In addition to an agenda that has turned off many independents, Trump is complicating individual races by breaking from precedent and taking sides in contested primaries. In governors’ races in South Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Kansas, the president intervened to lift his preferred candidates and effectively handed the Republican Governors Association the bill.

With hard-line candidates winning nominations thanks to Trump, general elections could prove more difficult for Republicans. And it will be up to the governors association to prop up the candidates the president effectively crowned.

For some of the races — even ones in which Trump helped recruit the candidate — the best bet for Republicans may be to keep voters’ attention focused more on local issues and less on the swirl of national politics in Washington.

“You need to try to localize these races and run them where it becomes not a referendum on Trump’s favorability, but a test of candidate strength,” Madden said. “Trump is a double-edged sword.”