National News

Tillis works to pass same-sex marriage bill despite earlier opposition

U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina helped the Respect for Marriage Act pass a key vote in the Senate this week by amending it to add protections for religious freedoms. But critics on the religious right say the protections don't go far enough.

Posted Updated

By
Laura Leslie
, WRAL Capitol bureau chief
RALEIGH, N.C. — It was just ten years ago that U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis served as speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives.

At the time, he backed an amendment to ban same-sex marriage in the state's constitution.

Thursday, Tillis, R-NC, said times have changed.

The proposed Respect for Marriage Act would do two things: Change federal law to recognize the right to same-sex and interracial marriage, and overturn a 1996 law, the Defense of Marriage Act or DOMA, that said states don’t have to recognize those marriages if they were performed in other states. That's all the current status quo due to the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case. But supporters worry that the current Supreme Court might overturn that ruling.

Tillis was one of the negotiators who helped the bill move forward in the Senate this week by amending it to add protections for religious freedom.

"Let's say the Supreme Court decision is reversed," Tillis said Thursday during a virtual press conference. "We think that we owe this community some certainty that if they're in states that recognize same-sex marriages, they can travel freely through the United States and keep their families secure."

"Why not take some time to provide certainty to these families and take the opportunity to provide greater protections for religious freedom?" Tillis added.

Tillis's support for the bill is surprising, considering that as former speaker, he advanced a bill to amend the state constitution to ban same sex marriage. That ban was approved by N.C. voters in 2012 and is still in the state constitution, but it was nullified by the 2015 Obergefell ruling. The federal law would ensure that it never takes effect again.

WRAL News asked Tillis whether he has changed his mind on same-sex marriage.

"Lots has changed since then, not the least of which is the Obergefell decision that rescinded that action," Tillis responded. "I do think the Supreme Court decision changes the factors that lead you to a conclusion to support or not support the bill. It certainly did for me.

"When I make decisions, I make decisions based on current data, current facts," Tillis added. "The current data and current facts have changed."

Advocates for the LGBTQ+ community are supporting the measure, though they say it doesn't go as far as an earlier House version did to ensure equal rights. Cathryn Oakley with the Human Rights Campaign says much work remains to do, but the bill will still act as an insurance policy or backstop against potential action by the Supreme Court.

"It is a limited bill," Oakley said. "But what it is doing is really, really important, and is going to really impact people's lives.

"This is not a replacement for continuing to fight in state legislatures where we have had absolutely unprecedented attacks on the LGBTQ community, and particularly on trans kids," Oakley added. "All of those pieces are still in front of us. And this is one very important slice of a much larger pie of work."

Tillis and North Carolina's other senator, Richard Burr, are two of twelve Republican senators supporting the bill. They've taken heat from religious conservatives who say the bill doesn’t go far enough to protect religious freedom.

Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, a conservative law firm affiliated with Liberty University, said the legislation falls short on religious freedom protections.

"It's very, very limited," Staver said of the clause in the bill offering protection for religious freedom. "It does apply to churches or places of worship in certain limited issues, such as tax exemption, and also nonprofits, but only if the nonprofit is engaged primarily in teaching the Bible or religious doctrine. It doesn't apply to all nonprofits, and it wouldn't apply to other Christian organizations. And it certainly doesn't apply to individuals."

The law requiring recognition would only apply to state and federal officials, not individuals. But Staver predicted it will still lead to a rise in lawsuits against groups and individuals who refuse to recognize or provide services to LGBTQ people.

Tillis disagreed. He said many religious groups, including the Church of Latter-Day Saints, support the bill, although he didn't deny some groups could still be at risk of lawsuits.

"I stand with the religious community that [those lawsuits are] inappropriate," Tillis said. "But that, in many respects, is a risk that already exists, and what we've done here is lessen the risk."

The Senate is expected to take a final vote on the bill after Thanksgiving. It would then go back to the U.S. House.

 Credits 

Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.