Three candidates vie for 7th Congressional District seat
Democrat Jonathan Barfield, Libertarian Wesley Casteen and Republican David Rouzer outlined their differences on immigration, health care and the economy Thursday night.Posted — Updated
The Republican-leaning district takes in part or all of 12 different counties, moving south from Johnston County, picking up parts of Cumberland County and all of Sampson County before winding up in New Hanover County.
"If this race were measure in dollars and cents, the outcome would be a foregone conclusion," said Casteen, a lawyer and accountant from Wilmington.
He was referring to the fundraising advantage enjoyed by Rouzer that has allowed the Republican to put ads on broadcast television.
Aside from Sean Haugh, who is running for U.S. Senate, Casteen is the only Libertarian running for federal office in North Carolina this year, and he urged voters to look past partisan labels to see who has the better ideas.
"Adapting to change does not mean sending the same people back to Washington from the same parties that caused the problems," he said.
Rouzer, a former state senator, emphasized during the forum his experience working for U.S. Sens. Jesse Helms and Elizabeth Dole and repeatedly returned to the theme of cutting federal regulations as the key to solving a number of problems.
"We've got to get rid of the stupidity," Rouzer said, punctuating his point that it was federal regulations that were putting a drag on the economy and hurting businesses big and small.
Barfield, a county commissioner from New Hanover County, drew on his experience as a father, real estate agent and preacher in his answers and appealed for a more civil public discourse among public officials.
"I find the citizens are tired of the Hatfields and the McCoys," Barfield said, describing the feuding political parties in Washington, D.C.
Minimum wage and health care
On some policies, the differences between the candidates were stark. For example, asked about raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10 per hour, Barfield said he backed the move, saying that it would pump money into the economy and give those working full-time a better shot at making ends meet.
"If we increase the minimum wage to $10.10, you're going to see an infusion into the economy," he said.
Casteen said that the real fix to minimum wage was not a one-time hike but rather indexing it to the inflation so that pay for the state's lowest paid workers keeps pace with the cost of living.
Rouzer said he opposed raising the minimum wage.
"The minimum wage is more straw on the back of our small businesses," he said.
On the Affordable Care Act, what some people call "Obamacare," both Rouzer and Casteen said they opposed the law. Casteen cited a litany of health care problems, such as the recent Veterans Administration scandal and problems keeping tabs on Ebola patients, as evidence the federal government doesn't manage health care well.
"If anything, the federal government has proven itself completely incapable of socialized medicine," he said.
Rouzer said he favored scrapping the ACA in favor of reforms such as limiting lawsuits against doctors and "de-coupling" health insurance from employers.
Barfield emphatically backed the health care law, saying he had witnessed real estate agents who earn good money struggle to afford their health insurance premiums when business slows down.
"There is no way you can love your neighbor as you love yourself if you don't have access to affordable health care for the folks who need it most," he said.
Views on immigration separates the candidates
Asked about what the federal government should do on immigration, all three candidates differed from one another.
Rouzer took the hardest line.
"I do not support a path to citizenship for anybody who has come here illegally," he said.
Rather, Rouzer said, he favors reforming the immigration system so that large employers and farmers could get the seasonal labor they needed but that allowed those workers to return to their countries of origin.
On the other end of the spectrum, Barfield said he backed a bipartisan measure that passed the U.S. Senate that would lay out a path to citizenship for those here illegally after those people met certain requirements, such as paying fines.
"We all came here in different ships," he said, "But we're in the same boat now."
Casteen sketched out a position that seemed midway between his two opponents. He was critical of the federal government's efforts to control the border and set up a sensible immigration system that allows those wishing to come her legally a clear path to do so.
While he did not favor allowing all who arrived her illegally to stay, he said that children who came here through no fault of their own should be granted a route to citizenship.
"Their home is the United States," he said.
Other issues mark differences
The candidates did occasionally find common ground. Each, for example, pledged not to exacerbate partisan tensions in the nation's capital. But on substantive issues, the three men typically had different policy approaches, and none thought that imposing term limits in Congress was a realistic option. Among the other topics they spoke about:
Copyright 2023 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.