National News

The Bells of St. Martin’s Fall Silent as Churches in Harlem Struggle

NEW YORK — In a tower above Malcolm X Boulevard in Harlem are more than 40 large bells that were fabricated in the Netherlands — they form the carillon of a once-proud church, St. Martin’s, and are one of only three carillons in New York City. The queen mother of the Netherlands attended a dedication ceremony in the 1950s. The current Episcopal bishop of New York says it was “a giant big deal” that she was there.

Posted Updated
The Bells of St. Martin’s Fall Silent as Churches in Harlem Struggle
By
James Barron
, New York Times

NEW YORK — In a tower above Malcolm X Boulevard in Harlem are more than 40 large bells that were fabricated in the Netherlands — they form the carillon of a once-proud church, St. Martin’s, and are one of only three carillons in New York City. The queen mother of the Netherlands attended a dedication ceremony in the 1950s. The current Episcopal bishop of New York says it was “a giant big deal” that she was there.

The bells were last played in July, and then only briefly during an inspection by a carillon expert. The last time they were heard regularly was in 2013 because the carillon has been “deemed structurally unsound,” said Malcolm J. Merriweather, a member of the congregation. He is also a conductor and an assistant professor of music at Brooklyn College.

The carillon has become a flashpoint in a dispute among some members of St. Martin’s and the Episcopal Diocese of New York over how to repair the instrument and the rest of the decaying church building. In August, the bishop replaced the congregation’s lay leaders after failing to come to terms on $2.4 million that he offered to advance for the repair work. He wanted St. Martin’s to repay the money to the diocese by selling one of three nearby brownstones that it owns.

Real estate also figures in the conversation at another nearby Harlem church, Metropolitan Community United Methodist Church. Like St. Martin’s, Metropolitan Community is in such bad repair that services are no longer being held in the sanctuary, where the ceiling collapsed a couple of years ago.

The struggles of the two congregations are emblematic of the troubles afflicting what was once one of the most church-filled and church-conscious neighborhoods in the United States. But attendance in Harlem has dwindled as America has become less religious, and some congregations in Harlem have merged with others in an effort to remain viable. Nationally, with polls indicating that more Americans than ever consider themselves “spiritual but not religious,” headline writers summarize what has happened as “the great American unchurching” or “the de-churching of America.”

At Metropolitan Community, the Rev. Richard N. Hayes said the plan was to sell some of the church’s real estate — including the sanctuary. Hayes said the congregation would then build a new building on a nearby lot that the church owns and does not plan to sell.

Selling the sanctuary building has angered people who do not want to lose a part of Harlem’s past. Among them is Derek Q. Johnson, who grew up in Metropolitan Community, even as he acknowledged that it was hard to describe the building as being “in a state of anything other than perhaps unsalvageable disrepair.”

But he also talked about accountability “both for the community of people who count themselves as worshippers and congregants” and for church leaders who, he said, “recognizing that these churches have lost their relevance — the relevance of yesteryear that commands the kind of maintenance funding you’d have to put in to sustain them — have become accountants rather than spiritual fiduciaries.” The tribulations at Metropolitan have a familiar ring to Michael Henry Adams, a historian who leads tours in Harlem and is the author of “Harlem: Lost and Found, an Architectural and Social History, 1765-1915.”

“Historically, the old people I’ve talked to say there was a bar and a church on every corner,” Adams said. “Today, there’s neither.” He said the disappearance of bars was understandable. “People socialize in a different way” nowadays, he said. “Bars are no longer neighborhood living rooms where people go on a regular basis.”

As for churches, he worries that the money from selling assets will not last as long as leaders expect it to, “and sooner or later they’ll be right back where they started.” Churches, he added, could be replaced by apartment buildings with condominiums filled with the kind of people who will not help the neighborhood’s remaining sanctuaries. “The overwhelming majority of people who buy condominiums in these buildings will be white,” he said, “and therefore will hasten the day that these churches close altogether because it is unlikely that most of these people who move into these condominiums will become members of these churches.”

Both churches were built by white congregations before Harlem became a black metropolis — Metropolitan Community in 1870, St. Martin’s a decade later. The original white Methodist congregation moved out in the 1930s. A black congregation that had been worshipping nearby took title to the building.

St. Martin’s was taken over by a black congregation under the Rev. John Howard Johnson, who led a boycott of retailers on 125th Street, a main street for shopping in Harlem, who resisted hiring or promoting blacks.

A fire in 1939 left the building badly damaged, but as Johnson’s parishioners made plans to rebuild, they commissioned the carillon. The Rev. David Johnson, Johnson’s son and successor at St. Martin’s, proudly called the carillon “the poor people’s bells.” The expert who played the carillon in July called it something else: “A cultural treasure” and “an irreplaceable historical instrument.”

The expert, Tiffany Ng of the University of Michigan, also noted that it was the first carillon in the world to be played by a black musician, Dionisio A. Lind, who moved to the larger carillon at the Riverside Church 18 years ago. Merriweather said that St. Martin’s did not replace him.

What has played out at St. Martin’s over the last few months has been a complicated tale of architects and contractors, some brought in by the lay leaders of the church, others by the Episcopal diocese. The vestry — the parish’s governing body, made up of lay leaders — wrote the diocese in July with concerns that the diocese “would seek to pass along the costs” to the vestry, even though the vestry had not been involved in hiring the architects and contractors the diocese sent in. Some parishioners complained of a lack of transparency on the diocese’s part.

Bishop Andrew M.L. Dietsche said it was not the carillon that had brought St. Martin’s to his attention, but a structural survey conducted several years ago. By spring 2017, Dietsche said the architect who had conducted the survey was warning that “the bell tower is in such urgent trouble that it is not inconceivable it could collapse in the next 30 days.”

The architect’s report also said the tower was “supported primarily by gravity,” after noting that a brick backup wall “effectively has no mortar.” The roof and floor in the tower had been “saturated with water for so many years that the wood is severely rotted.”

In 2017, Dietsche offered the church what amounted to a loan of $2.4 million. “I said, ‘You don’t have any money, but you do have what most parishes don’t, a surplus of real estate,” he said in a recent interview. He said he had called for St. Martin’s to repay the money by selling one of three nearby brownstones that it owns.

The bishop said that time passed, but no one from the vestry signed the contract he had prepared to codify the deal for the diocese to advance the money to the church. “I came to wonder if they were willing to sell the brownstones,” he said of the members of the vestry.

In August, he dissolved the vestry after designating St. Martin’s a vulnerable parish under church law, steps he said he took because of the “absolutely on-fire urgency of getting the necessary contract agreements signed so we could go forward with the restoration.” By then, he said, the diocese had put about $400,000 into preparatory rehabilitation work.

He noted that he had not required St. Martin’s to transfer to the diocese the titles to its property, as he could have, and that if the brownstones were sold, the money “will go into the parish’s accounts,” not the diocese’s.

“My interest is in stabilizing and restoring St. Martin’s. It begins and ends with that.” He also said, “That building must be saved.” Diocesan officials say it is in everyone’s interest to keep the church going. Dietsche said he was “conscious of liabilities that would fall on the parish and then would come straight to the diocese” if there were an accident.

He closed the building in midsummer and announced that services for St. Martin’s would be held in a building on the grounds of the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine. He himself attended the first. But some parishioners, including Merriweather, held their own service on Malcolm X Boulevard, on the sidewalk outside St. Martin’s.

“I’ve had a lot of sleepless nights over what has happened to this community,” he said. “It’s kept me up at night. I’m extremely disappointed in the leadership of the diocese.”

Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.