Political News

Senators Reach Bipartisan Deal to Ease Sentencing Laws

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of senators has reached a deal to rewrite the nation’s sentencing and prison laws for the first time in a generation, giving judges more latitude to sidestep mandatory minimum sentences and easing drug sentences that have incarcerated African-Americans at much higher rates than white offenders.

Posted Updated
Senators Reach Bipartisan Deal to Ease Sentencing Laws
By
Nicholas Fandos
and
Maggie Haberman, New York Times

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of senators has reached a deal to rewrite the nation’s sentencing and prison laws for the first time in a generation, giving judges more latitude to sidestep mandatory minimum sentences and easing drug sentences that have incarcerated African-Americans at much higher rates than white offenders.

The lawmakers believe they can get the measure to President Donald Trump during the final weeks of the year if the president embraces it.

The compromise would eliminate the stacking regulation that makes it a federal crime to possess a firearm while committing another crime, like a drug offense; expand the “drug safety valve” allowing judges to sidestep mandatory minimums for nonviolent drug offenders; and shorten mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders, according to draft text of the bill obtained by The New York Times.

It would also retroactively extend a reduction in the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine signed into law in 2010, potentially affecting thousands of drug offenders serving lengthy sentences.

“We have the clearest path forward that we have had in years,” said Holly Harris, executive director of the Justice Action Network, a bipartisan coalition arguing for an overhaul. “This would be the first time that these members have voted on a piece of legislation that turns away from the lock-'em-up-and-throw-away-the-keys policies of the 1990s. That is groundbreaking.”

Lawmakers and outside advocates involved in the push expect Trump to render his judgment on the package as soon as this week. Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and the leading voice for the changes within the White House, is likely to brief Trump on the bill during a broader discussion of legislative priorities with top policy officials Tuesday, according to one senior administration official, who was granted anonymity to discuss the plans. And at least two influential Republican senators were lobbying the president in its favor.

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the Senate majority leader, has told the senators he would bring the package up for a vote if they could show they had the support of at least 60 senators. House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, a vocal advocate of such changes, committed to putting the compromise on the House floor in a lame-duck session that begins Tuesday if Trump endorses it and it can clear the Senate.

“Speaker Ryan has long advocated for criminal justice reform,” said AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Ryan. “The House passed legislation earlier this year, and we are hopeful the Senate will act so we can get a bill to the president’s desk.”

The support of the famously mercurial Trump is by no means guaranteed. But if they can secure an endorsement, senators say they can move quickly on the kind of bipartisan achievement that has eluded Trump — and bedeviled senators and outside advocates of the overhaul for years.

The effort has brought together an unlikely coalition of advocacy groups from the left and the right, including billionaire conservatives Charles G. and David H. Koch and the American Civil Liberties Union. But with the arrival of the Trump administration and its return to tough-on-crime policies, many believed the chances of changing federal law were all but shot.

The bill, called the First Step Act, is more modest than the much-trumpeted set of changes that stalled in the Senate last term, but its provisions are still far-reaching and could win support across the ideological spectrum. It creates a suite of programs and incentives intended to reduce recidivism and prohibits the shackling of female inmates while pregnant, among other prison-focused measures.

Unlike in the 2015 proposal, the elimination of the “stacking” provision and the reduction of mandatory minimums for nonviolent offenders would not apply retroactively — a concession by Democrats that greatly narrows the effect of the changes for the current prison population.

The latest compromise was crafted by Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; and Mike Lee, R-Utah, in conjunction with Kushner. Those senators won a promise from Trump in August that he would consider backing a bill during the lame-duck session. Grassley, the Judiciary Committee chairman, and another senior Republican on that committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have lobbied Trump in the months since.

If Trump supports the package, senators will still be up against a rapidly closing legislative window — Congress is set to break in mid-December — and certain opposition from conservative Republicans in both the Senate and the House.

Democrats could also throw up roadblocks if liberals think they could get a better deal once Democrats take control of the House.

If Trump does not back the measure, lawmakers concede its chances of advancing this Congress are almost none.

But advocates of changes to the sentencing and prison laws see a path to passage. The Fraternal Order of Police, the country’s largest police organization, announced Friday that it would support the bill. The National Sheriffs’ Association, another key constituency, appears to have dropped some of its objections after a meeting with Kushner late last week, the senior administration official said.

“We have a bill that will make our streets and neighborhoods safer, our police will be better protected and improve the ability of our criminal justice system to effectively rehabilitate offenders,” Chuck Canterbury, the police order’s president, said in a statement. Lawmakers may have also gotten a boost with the departure of Jeff Sessions as attorney general last week. Sessions had used his post to order federal prosecutors to pursue the toughest possible charges and sentences for crime suspects, reversing Obama-era efforts to ease such penalties for some nonviolent drug offenders. And he vigorously opposed legislative compromise, going head to head not only with Grassley but also with Kushner.

Kushner has had several meetings with Matthew Whitaker, the new acting attorney general, who has signaled that he is open to the changes. The effort could be revived in the next Congress if he and allies are unable to succeed in the short term.

Kushner has also traveled with Vice President Mike Pence in recent days to brief the vice president on the latest developments, the administration official said.

If Trump offers his support this week, Grassley would introduce the bill within days. Durbin is then expected to endorse it and lobby fellow Democrats.

The senators believe they can win over most Democrats and, with cover from Trump, a large block of Republicans. But they fear outspoken conservative opponents to liberalizing sentencing laws, especially Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, could pull Trump out of their camp.

Then there is the House, which passed a prison bill that excluded any modifications to sentencing laws this year by an overwhelming margin. The addition of sentencing changes is likely to sweeten the deal for Democrats and turn off some Republicans. A Democratic strategy of delay until next year comes with substantial risks — Senate leaders and the White House could withdraw support. A spokesman for Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, declined to comment.

Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.