Senate wants to tie teaching assistant money to economic development bill
Senate leaders have drafted a bill that gives school districts more flexibility in how they spend money but would require the state House to pass a controversial economic development and sales tax bill.Posted — Updated
Senators sent that measure to the state House on a 34-6 vote Thursday night.
House and Senate negotiators agreed to compromise economic development legislation, which the Senate has passed. The House has thus far not taken up the compromise because it is unpopular with rank-and-file Republicans who are circumspect about government-funded incentives.
As both the House and the Senate make plans to adjourn for the year this week – albeit similar plans have been scuttled several times this summer already – senators have crafted a bill that would fix the teaching assistant issue.
"Based upon the description, it does sound like it would work," said Leanne Winner, a lobbyist for the North Carolina School Boards Association.
However, there's a catch.
TAs tethered to sales taxes
House Bill 1224 allows counties to place a referendum on the ballot raising local sales taxes a quarter-cent or a half-cent for either education or transit needs. The new language in House Bill 718 makes modifications to how much county commissioners can control the money used for education with regard to budgets passed by local school boards.
House Bill 718 also says that both sections of the bill – both the sales tax language and the teaching assistants fix – will go into effect only if House Bill 1224 becomes law.
"You all are playing political games," said Sen. Josh Stein, D-Wake. "You're actually saying to the House, 'If you care about TAs, you've got a gun to your head. ... You have to fire TAs or put up with our bad bill.'"
But Republican leaders said that both the teaching assistant fix bill and the sales tax measure would help counties and local school districts.
"It gives counties another avenue to raise revenue for education rather than property tax, and I think most counties will support it," Sen. Harry Brown, R-Onslow, said.
Many House members were uncomfortable with the new sales tax authority. As well, House Bill 1224 contains several economic development provisions that bring with them varying degrees of controversy. They include:
- A job catalyst fund designed to help the governor and the secretary of commerce land big economic development projects such as car manufacturers. The state budget sets aside $20 million in case this fund is created, and there's the potential for more money to be added in case of a specific project requires it.
- A boost to the state's JMAC fund designed to help a paper mill in western North Carolina convert to a more environmentally friendly power source.
- A measure to allow North Carolina companies to raise small investments through crowdfunding.
- A fix to the state's unemployment laws that would allow the state to keep certain records confidential.
- An extension of the state's renewable energy tax credit designed to help certain solar projects.
The House isn't scheduled to take any votes until 10 a.m. Friday. House leaders will apparently be faced with the choice of adjourning without a teaching assistants fix, getting the fix by agreeing to a somewhat unpalatable bill or leaving the legislature in a state of continued limbo.
House Rules Committee Chairman Tim Moore, R-Cleveland, said House Republicans have scheduled a caucus meeting before session Friday. A vote of that group, he said, will likely determine what the chamber does later in the day.
Asked whether he thought it was appropriate to tie the teaching assistant fix to the economic development bill, House Speaker Thom Tillis also said he needed to talk with fellow Republicans.
"It certainly wouldn't be the first time either chamber has done something like that," Tillis said.
Copyright 2023 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.