Entertainment

Review: ‘John McEnroe’ Captures a Perfectly Imperfect Tennis Star

In 1984, John McEnroe played 85 tennis matches and lost only three. That’s basically perfect. The “realm,” though, in “John McEnroe: In the Realm of Perfection,” a documentary essay by Julien Faraut, implies approximation, propinquity, “almost.” He was in perfection’s neighborhood; human, fitfully and courtesy of actual fits. That record — the highest single-season win percentage in tennis’ so-called Open era (for a man) — remains all his. But statistics-driven godliness isn’t the sort of perfection that fascinates Faraut.

Posted Updated

By
Wesley Morris
, New York Times
In 1984, John McEnroe played 85 tennis matches and lost only three. That’s basically perfect. The “realm,” though, in “John McEnroe: In the Realm of Perfection,” a documentary essay by Julien Faraut, implies approximation, propinquity, “almost.” He was in perfection’s neighborhood; human, fitfully and courtesy of actual fits. That record — the highest single-season win percentage in tennis’ so-called Open era (for a man) — remains all his. But statistics-driven godliness isn’t the sort of perfection that fascinates Faraut.

His movie is a dream of McEnroe, an amusing, hypnotic, whimsical, expertly constructed adventure in craft, built from hours and hours of archival footage of his early 1980s dominance, but only at Roland Garros (which hosts the French Open, which McEnroe never won). It aims to understand an athlete’s brilliance by turning his game inside out, flipping and reversing it, conjecturing about and psychologizing him, close reading the repetitive motion, quirks, and kinks, breaking down McEnroe’s breakdowns.

The guy’s wildly temperamental tennis would never be my first choice for such an acutely cinematic undertaking. But Faraut knows what he’s doing. And what he’s done is cull a fantasia — a kind of punk French new wave — from reels of old film. Those belonged to the director Gil de Kermadec, France’s first national technical director of tennis. He wanted to make instructional films, with star players doing prematch demonstrations. Those seemed fake to him. So he got the tournament to let him film the matches themselves, making natural portraits of players, their technique, style and personalities. The last of these was of John McEnroe.

The result is as strangely satisfying and oblong a rendering of a sport or athlete as I can think of, up there with Roland Barthes’ essay, from 1957, on the spectacle of professional wrestling, and Kon Ichikawa’s saga of the 1964 Olympics.

“In the Realm of Perfection” is slenderer, knottier, more self-consciously besotted than that. It’s both suitable for a minimally furnished den of midcentury modern collectors items and a movie Wes Anderson might have made about Richie Tenenbaum, of “The Royal Tenenbaums,” had life been kinder to Richie. And yet it doesn’t wink. It’s not an antique.

Faraut’s impressionistic conflation of humor, wonder, horror and sympathy whisks this movie to the deluxe suite of the pleasure palace. We’re not given many time stamps, and it’s not until the final minutes that an actual match surfaces (it’s the 1984 seesaw French Open final against Ivan Lendl). The movie is all ideas about time and duration, all rumination about character, persona, drive and mental collapse.
Working with the editor Andrei Bogdanov, Faraut creates montages of McEnroe’s hopping into a backhand, over and over, of his dam-bursting tirades about the in-ness and out-ness of balls on the clay court. The movie believes enough in him as possibly the greatest ever geometrician of shots to marvel at the angles. It uses the tennis writing of the film critic Serge Daney as one source of insight and the claim that McEnroe was Tom Hulce’s inspiration to play Mozart as a bratty prodigy in “Amadeus” as another. One of McEnroe’s on-court meltdowns gets overlain with the dialogue from one of Jake LaMotta’s from “Raging Bull.” Sounds a tad much, I know — Mozart and LaMotta? But wasn’t that McEnroe at his impossible best: black eyes and symphonies?

“In the Realm of Perfection” arrives a week before the U.S. Open starts. And a not-insignificant aspect of John McEnroe’s relationship to it — and other major tournaments — is now as a glorified spectator. He sits in a booth and comments, for ESPN, NBC and the BBC, on the tennis other people play — calmer, saner, safe from himself.

——

Additional Information:

‘John McEnroe: In the Realm of Perfection’

Not rated. In French and English, with English subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 35 minutes.

Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.