Pros, cons unleashed in hearing on dog-tethering rule
At a county commissioners meeting, dozens of speakers came out for and against about a measure to limit dog tethering.
Posted — UpdatedThe board finally ended the public hearing without a vote, likely deferring action until fall.
The hearing went late into the night as the two sides sparred over the issue.
Tiger used to be chained to a 4-foot tether day and night, Brown said. The Coalition to Unchain Dogs has since built Tiger a fence.
“His tail never stops. He's happy. He gets to run,” Brown said of Tiger's transformation.
The coalition wants Orange County to severely restrict the dog-tethering portion of its animal control ordinance to allow no more than three hours in a 24-hour period.
The amendment drawn up county staff also would specify types of collars and equipment that could be used, minimum kennel sizes, certain exemptions and an 18-month educational period after enactment.
As presented Tuesday night, the ordinance would take effect in June 2009 and would have violators issued only warnings for one year as an educational effort. Penalties would not start until 2010.
The board had ordered the amendment drawn up last November after getting the report of a tethering committee.
Officials said Wednesday that a packed agenda for the commissioners' last spring meeting and the standard summer recess meant the ordinance won't come up again before September at the earliest.
Suzanne Roy said chains pose a safety hazard to dogs and that the coalition offers to build fences for dog owners who need financial assistance.
“Well, dogs don't run on 10 acres, they're on 10-foot tethers. I mean they don't have to fence the entire property,” Roy responded.
• Credits
Copyright 2023 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.