Local News

Study: Red-Light Cameras Fail To Reduce Accidents

Posted Updated
Switch to classic wral.com

RALEIGH, N.C. — Some people don't like red-light cameras, while others have a better opinion.

"As much as I didn't like getting a red-light ticket, I think that they really do the job," said one local driver.

The "job" is making intersections safer, and a new study says the cameras are not doing the job. After a five-year study of 300 Greensboro intersections, researchers say red-light cameras actually increase rear-end collisions.

"Red-light cameras were invented because timid local politicians were afraid to raise taxes if they could call it a safety issue, and that's what red-light cameras are," said attorney Bob Hensley. "They claim that it's a safety issue. This study now shows that it's not a safety issue."

So what does a city like Raleigh, which already operates red-light cameras, actually do with such a study? Raleigh city manager Russell Allen said they'll continue the program all the way.

"It's not news to any of us at the city level that the rear-end smaller kinds of collisions would increase from this kind of technology in place," said Allen.

Allen said the city installed the cameras to cut down on dangerous, high-speed side collisions. An N.C. State study released last February shows that side crashes have decreased by 42 percent at Raleigh's 12 red-light camera intersections. The study showed a 7 percent increase in rear-end crashes.

Raleigh says it doesn't make money off its red-light cameras. Currently, citations just pay operating costs.

 Credits

Mark Roberts, Reporter
Nathan Monroe, Photographer
Dana Franks, Web Editor

Copyright 2022 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

ImageFeedback