Grand Jury rebuffs Justice Department attempt to indict 6 Democrats in Congress

Federal prosecutors in Washington sought and failed Tuesday to secure an indictment against six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video this fall that enraged President Donald Trump by reminding active-duty members of the military and intelligence community that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders, four people familiar with the matter said.

It was remarkable that the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington — led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Trump’s — authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nation’s spy agencies.

But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in U.S. District Court in Washington rejected the effort, sending a signal that they did not believe that the lawmakers had committed any crimes.

It had been exceedingly rare for grand jurors to rebuff requests by prosecutors seeking indictments, although it has happened with increased frequency to the Justice Department under Trump, as his appointees push ahead with questionable cases.

The move to charge the lawmakers — among them, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona and Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan — was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by prosecutors to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Trump’s directives to prosecute his adversaries.

Prosecutors presenting the case sought to convince the grand jurors that the lawmakers had violated a statute that forbids interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces, according to one of the people familiar with the matter.

Pirro, the person said, believed she had a moral obligation to convince the grand jurors that a crime had been committed by Kelly, Slotkin and their four colleagues in the House: Jason Crow, a former Army Ranger; Maggie Goodlander, a former Navy reservist; Chrissy Houlahan, a former Air Force officer; and Chris Deluzio, a Navy veteran.

The Justice Department declined to comment.

Over and over, the Justice Department under Trump has brought questionable criminal cases against foes of the president — among them, former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. But even though many of these cases have been weak, the department has apparently determined that it might be better to fail in court rather than push back against Trump’s well-known desire for revenge.

Prosecutors, for instance, failed twice to reindict James after a federal judge tossed out her original charges, ruling that the U.S. attorney handpicked by Trump to prosecute the case had been illegally appointed to her job. The case against Comey was dismissed for the same reason.

The online video, which was organized by Slotkin, a former CIA analyst who served multiple tours in Iraq, did not mention any specific order or military scenario. But it was released as Trump was authorizing strikes against suspected drug boats in the Caribbean and considered deploying active-duty military troops to American cities to quell protests.

The lawmakers took turns reading a statement in which they cautioned that the “threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.”

“Our laws are clear,” said Kelly, a Navy veteran and former astronaut. “You can refuse illegal orders.”

Almost immediately, the video drew the ire of Trump, who demanded that the lawmakers be punished and even suggested they should be executed.

“SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” Trump wrote on his social media site. He shared another person’s post that said, “HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!”

Days later, the six lawmakers disclosed that the FBI had contacted the House and Senate sergeants-at-arms requesting interviews with them, indicating that a criminal investigation was underway.

“President Trump is using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress,” the four House members, all military veterans, who took part in the video said in a joint statement. “No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.”

Kelly, a Navy veteran and former astronaut, is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as “serious allegations of misconduct.”

In a social media post in November, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the video was “despicable, reckless, and false,” and he asserted that the lawmakers, whom he disparaged as the “Seditious Six,” were encouraging troops to “ignore the orders of their Commanders.”

“Their foolish screed sows doubt and confusion — which only puts our warriors in danger,” Hegseth wrote.

This article originally appeared in <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/us/politics/trump-democrats-illegal-orders-pirro.html">The New York Times</a>.