NC fetal tissue sale ban heads to McCrory
After an emotional and contentious debate, House members voted 79-29 to approve a bill that would block the sale of fetal tissue in North Carolina.Posted — Updated
"If they don't do it, it shouldn't be a problem," Rep. Sarah Stevens, R-Surry, said in response to her Democratic colleagues.
Others focused on the fact that a section of the bill would pull funding out of Planned Parenthood's teen pregnancy prevention efforts.
"I guarantee this bill would have passed in two minutes if it didn't have Section 3 in there," Rep. Nathan Baskerville, D-Vance, said.
But Baskerville said the funding issue drew his opposition.
While the funding issue, which could redirect how tens of thousands of dollars are spent, may have the more direct impact, it was the fetal tissue ban, its potential complications for research and members' moral objection to abortion that took center stage during the debate.
"The very idea that Planned Parenthood ... would want to reduce the number of abortions is ludicrous," said Rep. Larry Pittman, R-Cabarrus, adding that he believes the nonprofit would "give out contraceptives that don't work" in order to increase the number of abortions done.
"We are extremely disappointed in the legislature's passage of this bill. It is nothing more than a politically motivated attack on effective teen pregnancy prevention programs and critical research for life-threatening diseases," said Melissa Reed, executive director of Planned Parenthood Votes! South Atlantic. "It is shameful that the North Carolina legislature is using a fraudulent attack on Planned Parenthood to advance their extreme political ideology."
It's unclear what impact the bill will have on universities and others doing research that uses fetal tissue and stem cells. Because it bans "any consideration whatsoever," Rep. Verla Insko, D-Orange, pointed out it could ban any transfer of tissue in which costs for transportation or preservation were recovered.
"This legislature is attempting to smear Planned Parenthood’s trusted name without regard for the many families who may benefit from potential lifesaving medical research," Reed said.
But Republican lawmakers said that no state support should go toward an organization that in any way deals with abortion.
"That kind of thing is abhorrent," Rep. John Blust, R-Guilford, said.
Copyright 2023 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.