Media coalition sues NC election boards for voter records linked to secretive federal probe
A group of local and national news organizations is suing North Carolina election officials for records connected with 2018 federal subpoenas that targeted hundreds of voters across the state.
Posted — UpdatedThe complaint says the two boards are "knowingly and intentionally" violating North Carolina public records law and have been unable to identify any justification for refusing to produce the records, originally requested by WRAL News in May.
Spokespeople with the State Board of Elections and the North Carolina Attorney General's Office said the agencies would review the filing after receiving it late Friday afternoon. Wake County spokeswoman Dara Demi declined to comment until county attorneys could read the complaint.
The U.S. Attorney's Office delayed the subpoena deadline until after the election, and prosecutors also clarified they would accept redacted ballots.
Of that total, 289 were registered in 32 counties in the federal Eastern District of North Carolina. The other 500 came from elsewhere across the state. Most hadn't voted in several election cycles, state election officials said.
Other than that, there's been little clarity on who the voters are or why the state instructed county boards to collect several years of their voting histories, signed poll books and redacted ballots to deliver to federal investigators.
WRAL News' original record request, issued to the state and 32 eastern county election boards, sought the same digitized voter data they gathered for federal investigators, excluding traceable ballots.
Voter data is largely public record in North Carolina.
But a Wake County spokesperson told WRAL News in May that the board was "prohibited under both federal and state law" from releasing the requested information and forwarded subsequent questions to County Attorney Scott Warren. Warren's office didn't return multiple messages left at his office.
About a month later, State Board of Elections spokesman Pat Gannon also said the agency was prohibited from releasing the records. Laura Brewer, a spokeswoman for the Attorney General's Office, provided a similar statement.
"As you know, there are multiple reasons why a records request might be denied, included exceptions to the Public Records Act, provisions of federal law, court orders, and sensitive public security information," Brewer said. "I'm prohibited from providing a reason in this matter."
The media coalition lawsuit notes that state law requires that, if a records request is denied, "the denial shall be accompanied by an explanation."
In addition to seeking the records and any rationale for withholding them from the public, the lawsuit also seeks an unspecified amount of attorney fees.
• Credits
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.