Major energy bill coming to NC House floor as lawmakers struggle to grasp impact
Legislation would speed retirement of coal-fired energy plants in North Carolina, give Duke Energy much wanted regulator reforms.
Posted — UpdatedThe measure also boosts solar energy in the state, though. And it would set the stage for Duke to renew licenses on existing nuclear power plants while seeking approval for a new one.
"We still have questions from both sides of the aisle," Rep. Becky Carney, D-Mecklenburg, said during a House Energy and Public Utilities committee meeting on the bill Tuesday. "I think we’ve got a lot of work left to do.”
The bill has to move through two more House committees, but it could be on the House floor for a vote as soon as Wednesday, House Rules Chairman Destin Hall said Tuesday afternoon. It make take until early next week to move the legislation forward from there and on to the state Senate for more debate, he said.
"Candidly, I expect changes in the Senate," said Hall, R-Caldwell.
Amendments weren't allowed during Tuesday's committee hearing, frustrating some lawmakers who want to see the bill morph more, but they will be considered on the House floor, Hall said.
A number of House members complained that they haven't had time to digest the 48-page bill, which is full of dense regulatory language. A summary prepared by legislative staff runs 17-pages. Rep. Jimmy Dixon, R-Duplin, said he would liked to have been included in the months of closed-doors talks that led to the measure.
“It appears to me that very few, if any, legislators were intimately involved in that back-and-forth discussion," Dixon said.
Even lawmakers and staffers heavily involved in the process acknowledge the bill's complexities, which could mean uncertain outcomes. As he discussed a key section of the bill Tuesday, Rep. John Szoka, R-Cumberland, the Energy and Public Utilities co-chairman, said, “I’m not even sure that I understand it completely.”
Part of the bill would let Duke and other regulated utilities ask the Utilities Commission to approve rate increases three years at a time instead of requiring companies to come before the commission nearly every year in lawyer-heavy rate cases that can cost millions of dollars to put on.
Those costs are passed along to customers.
But the way this bill deals with that will also impact ratepayers, particularly when added to other language in the bill and combined with long-term energy plans already before the commission. There's a wide disparity in cost projections.
Public Staff Executive Director Chris Ayers also told lawmakers Tuesday that there are, by necessity, "a lot of assumptions" in the analysis.
Though often considered one entity, Duke's business in North Carolina is actually divided between two. Those two entities serve different parts of the state, and their rate increases are approved separately.
Whatever the actual impact, bill critics worry the measure gives away too much to Duke, whose chief executive has repeatedly mentioned and been asked about the prospects of legislative regulatory reform during the company's quarterly earnings calls with stock analysts. During the May call, Duke President and CEO Lynn Good told analysts that the legislation wouldn't have much bearing on earnings guidance the company had put forward for 2021, but that "it has a more dramatic impact on the back part of the decade as we accelerate the transition into 2030."
Related Topics
• Credits
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.