Local News

Lovette acquitted in Duke grad student's shooting death

Posted July 30, 2014 9:26 a.m. EDT
Updated July 30, 2014 5:42 p.m. EDT

— A man already serving life in prison for robbing and killing a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill student was acquitted Wednesday on all counts in a similar crime involving a Duke University graduate student, leaving family and friends stunned and upset by the verdict.

The jury of 10 women and two men deliberated nearly eight hours before reaching its verdicts in the two-week trial of Laurence Alvin Lovette Jr., 23, who was charged with first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm in the Jan. 18, 2008, death of Abhijit Mahato.

Prosecutors said Mahato was the victim of an "intentional, deliberate and premeditated murder" in which Lovette targeted the 29-year-old from Tatangar, India, robbed him of hundreds of dollars from his savings account and then shot him once in the head inside his Durham apartment.

"We are all shell-shocked," close friend Samarpan Majumder said Wednesday afternoon. "We have been hoping that some justice will ultimately come out."

"If Lovette did not kill him, who killed him?" his wife, Rinku Majumder, said. "I lost my respect in the judicial system."

Mahato's parents in India called their son's death "a diabolical crime" that left them wondering "what sins must we have committed to receive such a punishment."

"It still makes us cringe in anguish to think of the suffering of our son during his last few hours," Sitaram and Arati Mahato, said in a letter provided Wednesday to WRAL News. "What did he do to deserve such a fate – thus, is a question which keeps haunting us."

Mahato had moved to U.S. in the summer of 2006 and was in his second year of graduate studies for computational mechanics at Duke's Pratt School of Engineering. He was working on tire-safety research and also preparing to take his Ph.D. qualifying exams.

"He was by nature an outgoing person and could make friends easily. His friends loved his easy going personality and found him to be very warm and affable," his parents wrote.

He loved poetry and photography and life to its fullest, and friends described him as brilliant and believed he could have someday had a big impact on the world.

"We lost a great person who would have done so much for so many people," Rinku Majumder said. "He died, and there is no justice for him now? After seven years, how can I explain this to his parents?"

Prosecutors agreed.

In closing arguments Monday, they said Lovette not only robbed Mahato of his life, but "he took from society anything Abhijit Mahato could have engineered in his future."

"(Abhijit Mahato) had a vision for his future, and he was working toward it – a career, a family down the road," Durham County Assistant District Attorney Jim Dornfried told jurors. "He saw a future and was trying to make it happen, but he didn't see just how that future would be stolen from him, ripped from him."

The state had tried to establish that Lovette had a habit of violent behavior, and prosecutors called more than two dozen witnesses over six days who testified about Lovette's alleged admission to the crime as well as details about the murder of UNC student body president Eve Carson less than two months after Mahato.

Lovette was convicted of Carson's death in December 2011.

But defense attorneys argued there was no solid evidence – DNA, fingerprints or eyewitnesses – linking Lovette to Mahato's death and that the state's case rested on the testimony of one woman who was not a credible witness.

Lovette's attorney, Karen Bethea-Shields, credited Wednesday's verdicts to both God and a justice system that works as it should.

"The family of Mr. Mahato, and his friends, want the persons who did this to pay for what they did to Mr. Mahato," she said. "We don't look at this as a victory – like a sporting event – because this is a person's life that was taken. We look at it as a victory, in that God has used us to prove that, in fact, he was not guilty."

Dornfried said that, although the state is disappointed, it accepts the jury's decision.

"We worked with what we were given," he said. "Obviously, the defense pointed out certain deficiencies. I would leave that to the police department to explain why those deficiencies existed."

But the investigation in Mahato's death is not over.

Last week, the district attorney's office said it is considering possible charges against Lovette's friend, Phillip Maybrey, who testified that he lied when he initially told police he was with Lovette and that he heard him shoot Mahato.

"The question is not, from my standpoint, what I believe but rather what I can prove. I know there are questions regarding Mr. Maybrey," Dornfried said. "We are still discussing this case."