Some doctors say annual physicals aren't necessary
Posted June 21, 2012 5:30 p.m. EDT
Updated June 21, 2012 6:34 p.m. EDT
Durham, N.C. — Most people want to save time and money, and some health experts suggest people do both by not getting annual physical exams.
Critics say going to the doctor too often, even for routine medical exams, can lead to unnecessary tests that cost extra money and can lead to other complications.
The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation and Consumer Reports recently created a list of basic tests and procedures they claim have no value. Routine chest X-rays before surgery in patients with no symptoms, exercise EKGs in patients at low risk of heart disease and CT or MRI scans for simple fainting episodes made the list.
As with most medical decisions, however, patients need to find the balance that fits their specific medial and financial considerations.
Older patients, like 81-year-old Al Buehler, often visit the doctor more regularly. Buehler, a retired track coach from Duke University, said he wants to make sure no problems go undetected.
"At 81, Duke's done a great job at getting me here. And I hope to make another couple of more years before father time catches us," Buehler said.
Dr. John Paat, who works at the Duke Private Diagnostic Clinic, said each patient has to make personal decisions regarding how often to see a physician.
"Depending on your age, or your risk, and your specific concerns, if you're otherwise healthy and assymptomatic, it may be a different time frame," he said.
Paat recommends at least "periodic" visits for everyone so that doctors can get updates on medical issues important to each patient.
Thomas Jones, 40, said he's wanted to go to the doctor more often as he gets older because he's at increased risk for things like heart disease, diabetes and prostate cancer.
"I just feel more comfortable with myself knowing that my health is OK," he said.