Lawmakers push back on proposed changes to State Health Plan
A House committee voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to halt proposed changes to the State Health Plan until the end of next year so that a thorough study of the plan's operations and potential cost-saving measures can be conducted.Posted — Updated
Health care providers have furiously fought against Folwell's proposal, calling it in a television ad campaign a "risky scheme" that would make it harder for some people to get needed care.
"After all of the heated rhetoric is set aside, we want to bring all stakeholders to the table," Dobson said. "We want buy in from all involved that doesn't put access to health care at risk."
House Bill 184 calls for creating a 17-member commission to study cost drivers in the health plan, claims data, projected costs, various pricing models, cost transparency, premiums, incentives to encourage more primary care and possible subsidies for state workers to purchase private insurance through the Affordable Care Act.
The commission would come up with recommendations by December, and lawmakers would implement changes by December 2020.
Folwell's proposal won't fix financial problems with the State Health Plan, said Rep. Donny Lambeth, R-Forsyth, a former hospital executive. The study commission will be able to look at long-term reforms, such as managed care to limit costs.
The State Health Plan has more than 720,000 state employees, retirees and teachers as members, and it spends some $3.3 billion a year. Eighty percent of that comes from taxpayers.
Rep. Donna White, R-Johnston, is a retired state nurse and said she recognizes the concerns of state workers and retirees. But changes are "not just about the numbers," she said.
"We cannot fix the problems with health care with a shock-and-awe model," White said. "We need to take baby steps and work collaboratively."
Rep. Cynthia Ball, D-Wake, noted that North Carolina is in the middle of overhauling its Medicaid program, moving to a managed care model, and seeing other changes in health care, so it's probably not the best time to dive headfirst in a major change with the State Health Plan as well.
Rep. Phil Shepard, R-Onslow, was one of only two votes against the measure in the House Health Committee. He said he has been overwhelmed by "propaganda" on both sides of the debate but said he had heard from more constituents opposed to the bill than in favor of it.
"I know we have to do something, but there are a lot of unanswered questions for me," Shepard said.
The bill has two more stops before reaching the House floor. If approved there, it still must go through the Senate.
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.