Judge rules no punishing Smithfield Foods in hog farm nuisance case
A federal judge in North Carolina shut down a lawsuit against a Smithfield Foods hog-feeding operation on Thursday before jurors who determined the company was a nuisance to neighbors could discuss punishing the pork giant.
Posted — Updated
U.S. District Judge David Faber declared there wasn't enough evidence for neighbors to pursue punitive damages against the company.
"While we recognize that the outcome of this trial was far more favorable for our subsidiary Murphy-Brown and our industry than the three previous trials, we continue to believe these lawsuits are an abuse of our legal system and an attack on agriculture," Smithfield spokeswoman Keira Lombardo said in a statement.
Smithfield has filed motions to vacate the earlier damage awards, Lombardo said, noting "the real case about the plaintiffs and their properties was buried in an avalanche of distraction and manipulation."
State lawmakers have tried to shield the company from nuisance lawsuits in the future by limiting who can file suit suits and the circumstances under which they can be filed. Some lawmakers and state agriculture officials have called the lawsuits a threat to small farms in eastern North Carolina.
Related Topics
• Credits
Copyright 2023 by WRAL.com and the Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
