National News

Manafort Jury Holdout Blocked Guilty Verdicts on 10 of 18 Charges, Juror Says

Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, would have been convicted on all 18 charges of financial fraud but for one holdout juror, who forced a mistrial on 10 counts, another member of the jury said Wednesday.

Posted Updated
Manafort Jury Holdout Blocked Guilty Verdicts on 10 of 18 Charges, Juror Says
By
Matthew Haag
and
Sharon LaFraniere, New York Times

Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, would have been convicted on all 18 charges of financial fraud but for one holdout juror, who forced a mistrial on 10 counts, another member of the jury said Wednesday.

That juror, Paula Duncan, who described herself as a strong supporter of Trump, said on Fox News that even though she believed the prosecutors had targeted Manafort in hopes of gaining information against Trump, the evidence against him “was overwhelming.”

“I did not want Paul Manafort to be guilty,” Duncan said, “but he was.”

Manafort, 69, was convicted Tuesday of five charges of tax fraud, two charges of bank fraud and one count of failure to disclose a foreign bank account.

Duncan said 10 members of the jury were solidly convinced of his guilt on the other 10 counts as well. An 11th juror wavered at points but was ultimately won over after the other jurors pointed out what Duncan called an extensive paper trail.

“But the one holdout would not,” she said in an interview on “Fox News at Night with Shannon Bream.” “We laid it out in front of her again and again and she still said she had a reasonable doubt.”

She described the four days of deliberations as heated, adding: “Crazily enough, there were even tears.”

Court documents unsealed late Wednesday revealed more about tensions on the jury. As the prosecution prepared to wrap up its case, one of the jurors reported another juror to Judge T.S. Ellis of U.S. District Court for commenting on the case while the trial was still underway. The juror supposedly noted aloud that the defense was barely cross-examining some witnesses.

In the end, the judge rejected an oral motion by the defense for a mistrial, instead cautioned the jurors not to discuss the case among themselves until deliberations began.

Reached by phone Thursday, Duncan said she had no further comment beyond the interview. Although the judge refused to release the names of the jurors, she told Fox News that she came forward because “the public, America, needed to know” how close the Alexandria, Virginia, jury came to convicting Manafort on all charges.

After the jurors declared they had reached an impasse, the judge declared a mistrial on seven bank fraud counts and three counts of failure to disclose foreign bank accounts. Legal experts say Manafort is likely to face a prison term of six to 12 years for charges he was convicted of.

Duncan’s views on the 16-day trial — the only account so far to come from the jury — could influence the strategies of both the prosecution and defense as they prepare for Manafort’s trial on related charges next month in Washington, D.C.

She praised Ellis as “amazing” and repeatedly voiced skepticism about the motives of the special counsel, Robert Mueller, in seeking an indictment against Manafort.

“I think that they used Manafort to try to get the dirt on Trump or hoping that he would flip on Trump,” she said.

“The charges were legitimate but the prosecution tried to make the case about Russian collusion right from the beginning,” she added, apparently referring to the prosecutors’ attempts to describe the pro-Russia oligarchs in Ukraine who funneled $60 million to Manafort’s foreign bank accounts. “Of course, the judge shut them down on that,” she said.

She went out of her way to reject the notion that Manafort’s crimes reflected on the president, whom she said she supports “very much.”

She said that she drove to the courthouse every day with a hat in her back seat emblazoned with the slogan “Make America Great Again” and that she plans to vote for Trump again if he runs for re-election in 2020.

Even Manafort’s critics described him as a “brilliant” political consultant, she noted. “And why wouldn’t Trump want help with the campaign?” she asked.

On the first day of deliberations last week, the jury sent four written questions to the judge, including “Can you please redefine reasonable doubt?” Duncan said that question was a request from the holdout juror.

“Most of us did not want that question out there,” she said. “We felt a little foolish actually.”

She said the jury quickly agreed to disregard the testimony of Rick Gates. The president’s former deputy campaign manager and Manafort’s longtime aide, Gates testified in hopes of obtaining a lighter sentence for two felonies to which he pleaded guilty in February. “I think he would have done anything he could to preserve himself,” Duncan said.

But she described the documentary evidence against Manafort, hauled into the jury room in four cardboard boxes, as formidable. “It was pretty easy to connect the dots,” she said. “Most of us had no problem with that.”

Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.