Goldman Sachs Once Looked Invincible. Now It’s Losing Money.

Goldman Sachs used to seem invincible. In the fourth quarter, it lost money.

Posted Updated

, New York Times

Goldman Sachs used to seem invincible. In the fourth quarter, it lost money.

The Wall Street firm Wednesday reported its first quarterly loss since 2011. It was the result of a one-time $4.4 billion charge stemming from the new tax law. But even ignoring that unusual event, Goldman’s weak core results showed how far the firm has fallen.

The bank’s per-share earnings and revenue were both higher compared with a year earlier without the tax charge. But the results announced Wednesday also revealed a decline in Goldman’s trading might, which has been drained by a potent combination of placid markets and quiet clients. Revenue in its business of buying and selling bonds, commodities and currencies — historically an engine of Goldman’s results — sank to $1 billion in the fourth quarter, half of what it was during the same period in 2016. For the year, net revenue in that business fell 30 percent.

Tighter financial regulations, strikingly synchronized global monetary policy and new competition from financial upstarts are hitting trading at banks like Goldman especially hard. On Wednesday, the bank used one word to describe current conditions on Wall Street: “challenging.” Its clients are placing fewer trade orders than they did when market prices were changing more quickly and more dramatically.

Competitors like Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase have also reported declines in the so-called fixed-income trading business, but none quite as large as Goldman’s. Bank of America said Wednesday that revenue from its trading businesses was down 13 percent in the fourth quarter compared with the same period a year earlier. Citigroup’s was down 18 percent, the bank said Tuesday.

There were other, brighter elements to Goldman’s results, including near-record investment banking revenue and just under $3 billion in debt underwriting revenue — a record for the bank. Goldman’s earnings per share, excluding the tax charge, exceeded analysts’ expectations.

Overall, Goldman posted a quarterly loss of nearly $2 billion. The $4.4 billion charge tied to the tax law stems from a requirement that companies move cash from overseas back to the United States and revalue assets that Goldman would have used under the old tax system to reduce its effective tax rate.

Goldman announced its poor fourth-quarter showing as speculation mounts about who will succeed Lloyd C. Blankfein as the bank’s chief executive. Blankfein has held the job for nearly 12 years. Two of the leading contenders are Goldman’s co-chief operating officers and presidents, Harvey M. Schwartz and David M. Solomon.

Both men have been asked to find ways to address the problems in Goldman’s trading business, which the results Wednesday indicated were getting more severe. Solomon faced a development of a different kind Wednesday when federal prosecutors in New York City unsealed an indictment charging Nicolas De-Meyer, 40, with stealing $1.2 million worth of rare wine from a former employer. The former employer in question was Solomon, who employed De-Meyer as a personal assistant, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

According to the indictment, the wine was stolen from around October 2014 to around October 2016, when De-Meyer had been asked to transport it from the former employer’s Manhattan apartment to his wine cellar in East Hampton, New York.

De-Meyer was arrested in Los Angeles on Tuesday, according to a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles. De-Meyer could not immediately be reached for comment.

“The theft was discovered in the fall of 2016 and reported to law enforcement at that time,” a Goldman spokesman said.

Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.