Political News

Former Bush Aide is Trump Pick for Court

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday nominated Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, a politically connected member of Washington’s conservative legal establishment, to fill Justice Anthony Kennedy’s seat on the Supreme Court, setting up an epic confirmation battle and potentially cementing the court’s rightward tilt for a generation.

Posted Updated
Trump’s Reality TV Supreme Court Rollout, Slick and Substance-Free
Mark Landler
Maggie Haberman, New York Times

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday nominated Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, a politically connected member of Washington’s conservative legal establishment, to fill Justice Anthony Kennedy’s seat on the Supreme Court, setting up an epic confirmation battle and potentially cementing the court’s rightward tilt for a generation.

Presenting Kavanaugh at the White House, Trump described him as “one of the finest and sharpest legal minds in our time,” and declared him a jurist who would set aside his political views and apply the Constitution “as written.”

The nomination of Kavanaugh, 53, a federal appeals court judge, former aide to President George W. Bush and onetime investigator of President Bill Clinton, was not a huge surprise, given his conservative record, elite credentials and deep ties among the Republican legal groups that have advanced conservatives for the federal bench.

But his selection will galvanize Democrats and Republicans in the months before the midterm elections. Moments after the announcement, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the Senate minority leader, "I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have.” Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who leads the barest of Republican majorities, had expressed misgivings about Kavanaugh’s path to confirmation, but said he was a “superb choice.”

Kennedy, who is retiring, held the swing vote in many closely divided cases on issues such as abortion, affirmative action, gay rights and the death penalty. Replacing him with a committed conservative, who could potentially serve for decades, will fundamentally alter the balance of the court and put dozens of precedents at risk.

Kavanaugh’s long history of legal opinions, as well as his role in some of the fiercest partisan battles of the past two decades, will give Democrats plenty of ammunition for tough questions. Nearly 20 years ago, working for the independent counsel Ken Starr, he laid out broad grounds to impeach Clinton — words that Democrats can now seize on to apply to Trump and the Russia investigation.

In choosing Kavanaugh, the president opted for a battle-scarred veteran of Republican politics but also someone with close ties to the Bush family — a history that aides to Trump said he viewed as a strike against Kavanaugh and had to overcome.

Before serving Bush in the White House, Kavanaugh worked for him in the 2000 presidential vote recount in Florida. When Bush nominated him in 2003 to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Democrats complained that he was too partisan. He survived a contentious confirmation hearing and was confirmed in 2006.

In his remarks, Kavanaugh, who once clerked for Kennedy, said he would “keep an open mind in every case.” But he declared that judges “must interpret the law, not make the law.”

Democrats are still bitter that Republicans blocked President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to fill the last Supreme Court vacancy, created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016. Republicans denied Garland a hearing, arguing that the right to name a justice ought to be left to Obama’s successor.

Trump chose Justice Neil Gorsuch, who has voted much as Scalia had, leaving the court’s ideological dynamic basically intact. Replacing Kennedy will be far more consequential, almost certainly thrusting Chief Justice John Roberts, whose voting record has been more conservative than that of Kennedy, into the crucial median position on the court. For Trump, whose presidency has been marked by personnel upheaval, an uneven legislative record and persistent questions over his ties to Russia, the nomination offers a chance for a clear victory — one that would leave a lasting imprint on one of the nation’s most cherished institutions. It also fulfills, for a second time, Trump’s promise to his political base to name conservative judges in the mold of Scalia.

As he did in choosing Gorsuch, Trump turned the selection process into a kind of Supreme Court sweepstakes, conducting a parade of interviews, promising a blockbuster choice and stretching out his decision-making over a weekend at his golf club in New Jersey before the prime-time appearance at the White House.

Trump did not make a final decision until the past 24 hours, but he began logistical preparations for Kavanaugh’s appointment earlier during the weekend, according to a person familiar with the planning.

The president extracted a last bit of suspense from the process, appearing alone at the podium in the East Room to pay tribute to Kennedy and the widow of Scalia, Maureen, before announcing Kavanaugh, who entered from a side door with his wife, Ashley, and daughters, Margaret and Liza.

But there was less underlying drama than Trump’s theatrical approach suggested. As he did last time, the president chose from a list of two dozen candidates, carefully curated for him by the Federalist Society, which functions as a pipeline to supply conservatives to the federal bench.

Trump narrowed the list to four finalists: In addition to Kavanaugh, there were Judges Thomas M. Hardiman, Raymond M. Kethledge and Amy Coney Barrett. All four are white, middle-age conservative federal appeals court judges. Three are Catholic; only Kethledge is not. While there are ideological differences among them — Barrett is an outspoken social conservative, while Kavanaugh, Kethledge and Hardiman are viewed more as pro-business, law-and-order judges — all four have compiled uniformly conservative records.

One of the things that set Kavanaugh apart, aides to Trump said, was his Ivy League pedigree: He is a graduate of Yale and Yale Law School. He also impressed Trump during his interview, and was enthusiastically backed by the White House counsel, Don McGahn.

For Democrats, the nomination sets up a political battle they are likely to lose. While Republicans hold a razor-thin margin in the Senate — the absence of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., because of his brain cancer reduces it to 50 seats — a handful of Democrats might vote for the nominee, particularly those running for re-election in states where Trump won in 2016 and is still popular.

Among Democrats facing that dilemma: Sens. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Joe Manchin of West Virginia. All three voted to confirm Gorsuch. Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., who is also up for re-election, made his intention to reject Trump’s choice clear hours before he even announced it.

“I will oppose the nomination the president will make tonight because it represents a corrupt bargain with the far right, big corporations and Washington special interests,” Casey said in a statement.

However slim his odds of success, Schumer framed the confirmation battle as a referendum on the issues most important to Democratic voters, notably health care.

“Enormously important issues hang in the balance,” he said in the Senate before the announcement. “The right of workers to organize, the pernicious influence of dark money in our policy, the right of Americans to marry whom they love, the right to vote.”

Republicans hope the appointment will mobilize their voters as well. But the choice of Kavanaugh is perhaps the most challenging of the four finalists, with lawmakers warning that his voluminous record could prolong the confirmation process, even past the November election. McConnell told the president that Hardiman or Kethledge would have an easier path to confirmation. He worried about his independent-minded Kentucky colleague, Sen. Rand Paul, who has bitterly criticized the foreign policy of the Bush administration and might use that as grounds to hold up Kavanaugh’s nomination.

But McConnell’s warning may have actually backfired, two people close to the president said, pushing Trump toward Kavanaugh.

Though Trump was bothered by Kavanaugh’s connection to Bush, according to people who spoke with him, he was able to get over it, in part because he believed that Kavanaugh would embody the tradition of Kennedy.

Kavanaugh played up his credentials as a family man, mentioning that he coached basketball for his daughters. He spoke of the influence his mother had on him, noting that she was a teacher turned lawyer and later judge in his native Maryland, who practiced her closing arguments at the family dinner table.

The White House will roll out an intensive campaign to sell the nominee to the Senate and the American public. Kavanaugh will embark on a busy schedule of courtesy calls to key members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and other senators. The White House named Jon Kyl, a Republican former senator from Arizona, to help shepherd the nominee during his confirmation hearing. Kyl, the White House noted, served on the Senate Judiciary Committee during the confirmations of four of the last five Supreme Court justices.

Trump will also play a prominent role in promoting the credentials of Kavanaugh, though his task will be complicated by the fact that he leaves Tuesday for a weeklong trip to Europe for a North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit meeting and one-on-one meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia.

1 / 50

Copyright 2022 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.