Political News

Federal Judge Questions Counsel’s Pursuit of Manafort

Posted May 4, 2018 10:21 p.m. EDT
Updated May 4, 2018 10:23 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON — A federal judge in Virginia sharply challenged the special counsel’s case against Paul Manafort on Friday, suggesting that prosecutors had pursued fraud charges in hopes of gaining evidence that might incriminate President Donald Trump or even topple him from office.

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” Judge T.S. Ellis III said during a court hearing in Alexandria. “You really care about getting information that Mr. Manafort can give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump and lead to his prosecution or impeachment or whatever.”

Trump immediately seized upon the judge’s comments as proof that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, is out of control. In a speech Friday afternoon to the National Rifle Association in Dallas, he cited the judge’s critique. “I’ve been saying that for a long time,” he said. “It’s a witch hunt.”

He described the judge as “very special” and “highly respected,” and Manafort, who served as his campaign chairman for five months, as “a good person” who worked for him only briefly.

The judge’s unfriendly, even sometimes hostile, reception was a new turn of events for Mueller’s team, which has faced little confrontation thus far in court. Other Americans charged by the special counsel have pleaded guilty and most have agreed to cooperate with the prosecutors. But Manafort has mounted a vigorous defense against financial fraud and other charges, contending that Mueller has gone beyond his mandate.

Ellis, 77, who was appointed to the federal bench in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan, seemed sympathetic to the defense lawyer’s argument. He said that the crimes described in the indictment “manifestly don’t have anything to do with the campaign or with Russian collusion.” Some of the allegations, he noted, date to 2005 or 2007.

“I don’t see what relation this indictment has with anything the special counsel is authorized to investigate,” he said, according to a transcript of the hourlong hearing on a defense motion to dismiss the charges. He added, “What we don’t want in this country is we don’t want anyone with unfettered power.”

Mueller was appointed a year ago by the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, to investigate Russia’s election interference, possible links to the Trump campaign and “federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.”

Michael Dreeben, a prosecutor in the special counsel’s office, argued that Manafort’s financial ties with people in Russia and Ukraine fell in the scope of Mueller’s jurisdiction. “We followed the money into the transactions that led to the criminal charges here,” he said.

Ellis, who did not issue a ruling, acknowledged that prosecutors often hope to turn defendants into witnesses who can give evidence against more important targets. “The vernacular is ‘to sing,’” he said, or “tighten the screws.” He added, “I’m not saying it’s illegitimate.”

But he questioned why the special counsel’s team had pursued the charges against Manafort when it had referred allegations about the president’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, to federal prosecutors in Manhattan.

“Why in New York did you feel it wasn’t necessary to keep that, but it is necessary to keep this?” he asked. “I don’t see the difference.”

He mused at one point about whether the U.S. attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Virginia might handle the prosecution instead of Mueller’s team. He also asked whether the special counsel’s office had already run through its $10 million budget — a question that Dreeben said he could not answer.

The judge ordered prosecutors to give him a complete copy of an August memo in which Rosenstein outlined the authority of the special counsel. Rosenstein has specifically authorized Mueller to investigate allegations that Manafort, who lobbied for a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine, committed crimes involving payments from the Ukrainian government, according to the brief part of the memo that was made public when it was filed in court. Most of it was blacked out.

House Republicans allied with Trump have also sought a full version of the memo, the latest salvo in a tug of war with Rosenstein over records related to some of the Justice Department’s most politically charged investigations. The department has declined to hand over the document, citing a policy against sharing information on a continuing investigation.

The bank and tax fraud charges that Manafort faces in Virginia are rooted in the Ukrainian line of inquiry, as is a second indictment in the District of Columbia that accuses him of money laundering, failing to register as a foreign agent and making false statements to investigators. Manafort’s lawyers are seeking to dismiss those charges on the same basis.