WRAL Investigates

Legal expert: First amendment claim unlikely to protect Durham man from charges for entering US Capitol during Jan. 6 riot

Steve Baker, of Durham, describes himself as an "independent journalist" who merely followed the crowd to record history as hundreds breached the U.S. Capitol. Federal authorities may not see it that way, a free speech expert told WRAL Investigates.

Posted Updated

By
Cullen Browder
, WRAL anchor/reporter

On Jan. 6, hundreds of people flooded past police at the U.S. Capitol. So far, more than 700 of them have been charged with a crime, and charges are filed against more people seemingly every day.

"It's a romantic notion this is the 'people's house,' and certainly it does the people's business, but that doesn't mean it's accessible to everyone at all times," said Ken Paulson, who is the head of the Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University.

Paulson says those who entered the Capitol are unlikely to be acquitted by claiming a First Amendment defense. Those rights went out the door once protestors went inside, he said. "It really wasn't about the First Amendment. It was about trying to march into the Capitol and interfere with a presidential election, a sacred process in American government."

Steve Baker, of Durham, was among that crowd. He describes himself as an "independent journalist," and he has a history of writing conservative political commentary on various social media platforms, including some paid sites, under the moniker "The Pragmatic Constitutionalist."

But freedom of the press does not apply to his actions on Jan. 6, Paulson said.

Baker, who recorded the protest and siege that day, told WRAL News, "Suddenly there was this free flow of humanity going up those steps. So that was taking place, and, doing what I think any journalist would do, he would follow the story to where the story was headed."

Paulson pointed out that journalists of all stripes must follow the law. "It's just another job that's governed by the laws of the United States," he said, pointing out that Paulson had no press credentials to be in the Capitol and thus can be charged trespassing.

Federal prosecutors also hint they may charge Baker with interstate racketeering because he sold his video from that day. Paulson thinks that charge is a legal reach. "First of all, the government probably has a right to seize it and go and look at it, but they don't have a right to keep you from distributing it and sharing it. That's just part of the First Amendment," he said.

Baker, a member of local band Bull City Syndicate, agreed to talk with WRAL Investigates after the U.S. attorney investigating the Capitol siege informed the 61-year-old Durham man he likely faces federal charges for being in the middle of it.

In his first local interview about that day, Baker told WRAL Investigates he was witnessing history. “It was a cultural phenomenon in its own right,” he said.

Nine months later, FBI agents contacted Baker.

Prosecutors have also charged another Triangle man with same name. Stephen Baker, 32, of Garner was charged in late January for his involvement in the Capitol attack.
“I’m not an anti-government guy,” Steve Baker of Durham told WRAL Investigates. “I’m an anti-big government guy.” His videos and blogs show he bashes Democrats, vaccine mandates and at times former President Donald Trump. “I just didn’t trust him,” Baker said about Trump.

Baker announced to his thousands of followers he would attend the Jan. 6 Trump rally to see if rumors of real election fraud evidence might finally emerge. He says clearly, that didn’t happen. “It was the biggest nothing burger maybe in the history of all rallies,” he said.

While he has questions about election integrity, Baker argues he’s never taken the position that there was enough evidence of fraud to overturn the results of the 202 presidential election, and he recognizes President Joe Biden as the winner.

Baker recorded video for hours as the frustrated crowd streamed from the National Mall to the Capitol. He says that’s where things got ugly, “and I continued to document that video until it got too violent for me where I was,” he said.


Baker argues that as a self-described independent journalist, he followed the story. WRAL Investigates asked Baker why he decided to follow the crowd inside. He says, at the time, he didn’t feel like it was crime to go in and observe.

“On my side, there was a moment where it wasn’t a breach. There was an obvious pullback and a stand down by that line of officers,” he said.

Parts of Baker’s video inside and out of the building show officers walking by him, some on their cell phones, with little concern about him. He was also in position to record emergency crews as the brought out Ashli Babbitt on a stretcher after she was shot by an officer as she attempted to climb through a door.

Baker acknowledges some in the crowd came to do violence and damage. He got a peek inside House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s ransacked office.

Still, he maintains most of the crowd that marched past police wasn’t part of any insurrection.

“Did they want the election overturned? Yea, but there’s no crime in that,” he explained.

When pressed on the hundreds who streamed past officers into the building, “They didn’t go in taking over the Capitol,” he says. “That had already been done by the violent perpetrators that preceded them.”

WRAL Investigates asked Baker if he, at any time, thought what he was doing was illegal.

“That thought certainly did not ever cross my mind in that moment,” he said.

“I didn’t do any violence. I didn’t do any cat calling at the law enforcement officers. I didn’t throw anything at them. All I did was run a video camera,” Baker says of his role that day.

In an interview on the day of the takeover, Baker told a reporter for Washington, D.C., station WUSA, "Do I approve of what happened today? I approve 100%." He says his comment supporting the spirit of the protest was taken out of context.

When WRAL Investigates asked him if he approved of everything that happened that day in and around the Capitol, his answer was much different. “Oh, no. Absolutely not,” he said.

 Credits 

Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.