Elon Musk Accuses Tesla Employee of Sabotage

In scrambling to ramp up production of its Model 3 electric car, Tesla has run into trouble with robots and automated machinery, a need for more workers and a shortage of battery packs.

Posted Updated

Neal E. Boudette
, New York Times

In scrambling to ramp up production of its Model 3 electric car, Tesla has run into trouble with robots and automated machinery, a need for more workers and a shortage of battery packs.

Now Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, suspects his company might have a more unusual problem: sabotage.

In an email sent to employees late Sunday night, Musk said a disgruntled worker had broken into the company’s computer systems in an attempt to disrupt manufacturing.

“I was dismayed to learn this weekend about a Tesla employee who had conducted quite extensive and damaging sabotage to our operations,” he wrote. “This included making direct code changes to the Tesla Manufacturing Operating System under false usernames and exporting large amounts of highly sensitive Tesla data to unknown third parties.”

While it was not clear whether the operations in question were at its assembly plant in Fremont, California, its battery plant near Reno, Nevada, or elsewhere, this new disruption comes as Tesla is racing to streamline operations on the assembly line that produces the Model 3. Musk is counting on the midsize Model 3 to drive revenue higher, stabilize Tesla’s finances and enable the company to begin generating profits.

He has said Tesla will make money in the second half of the year if it is able to produce 5,000 or more Model 3s a week, a level he predicted would be reached by the end of the month. At the company’s shareholder meeting this month, Musk said the company had increased its output to about 3,500 Model 3s a week, up from around 2,000 a week in early May.

Tesla seemingly has no shortage of customers ready to buy the car. It took $1,000 deposits from nearly 400,000 people even before it began making the Model 3 last summer. A large portion of those customers, however, were expecting to buy a basic version that is priced at $35,000 but has not yet gone into production. For now, the company is making versions that sell for $50,000 and more.

“What versions they are producing are almost as important as how many they are producing a week,” said Rebecca Lindland, a senior analyst at Kelley Blue Book, an automotive research firm. “They’ve been talking about a mainstream car that anybody can afford, but what they’re making are still luxury cars that most buyers can’t afford.”

Lindland said she had sent a deposit for a base-price Model 3 but asked for a refund earlier this year when she realized that only the higher-priced versions would be available.

The specter of industrial sabotage adds a strange chapter to the extraordinary, if relatively short, history of Tesla. Defying critics, the company has proved that there is a viable market for electric cars and that they can command premium prices. It has pioneered methods of upgrading cars through software updates beamed over the air, the way iPhones can download operating systems. Taking an approach never tried before, Musk also built a gigantic factory in Nevada to reduce the costs of battery packs through vast scale.

At the same time, Tesla and its chief have experienced setbacks. At least three fatal accidents have occurred in the United States involving Tesla vehicles that were operating with the company’s Autopilot driver-assistance system engaged, drawing scrutiny from federal safety officials and raising questions about the system’s reliability. Musk also overestimated Tesla’s ability to mass-produce the Model 3; he once expected the company to churn out several hundred thousand in 2018.

While Tesla’s share price has made it more valuable than Ford and close behind General Motors, its shares were down almost 5 percent Tuesday.

One constant since Tesla was founded in 2003: The company has lost money every year. Tesla has several times raised money from investors to develop its cars and put them into production, and some analysts are concerned because the company must begin paying back some debt later this year.

Earlier this year, Moody’s Investor Service cut Tesla’s credit rating, noting that it could face a cash crunch if it failed to hit its Model 3 production targets. Just last week, Musk announced that Tesla was eliminating the jobs of about 3,500 people to cut costs.

In his email reporting sabotage, Musk seemed to stoke the notion that enemies of Tesla were working against it.

“As you know, there are a long list of organizations that want Tesla to die,” he wrote. “These include Wall Street short-sellers, who have already lost billions of dollars and stand to lose a lot more.” He also pointed to oil and gas companies, which, he said, “don’t love the idea of Tesla advancing progress of solar power & electric cars.” Of rival automakers, he added that “if they’re willing to cheat so much about emissions, maybe they’re willing to cheat in other ways?”

The employee thought to have harmed Tesla’s manufacturing system was not identified in the email, but Musk said the worker had admitted trying to damage the manufacturing system and was unhappy with the company after being passed over for a promotion.

The email was first reported by CNBC. A Tesla spokesman declined to discuss the content of Musk’s emails.

In a separate email to employees Monday, also reported by CNBC, Musk said a minor fire had broken out on the assembly line at its Fremont plant, halting production for several hours. He said it “could be just a random event” but added that it was “hard to explain” and urged employees to keep an eye out for any suspicious activity inside the company.

“This is when outside forces have the strongest motivation to stop us,” Musk wrote.

Copyright 2024 New York Times News Service. All rights reserved.