Editorials of The Times

Poor Republicans. They’ve tried so hard to be subtle, to seem respectful of Christine Blasey Ford, even as they’ve maneuvered to undermine her. They would hear her accusations that the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her in high school, they wanted us to know, if only she’d testify on their terms. They wanted Americans to think they had evolved in the 27 years since Anita Hill accused another Supreme Court nominee, Clarence Thomas, of sexual misconduct.

Leave it to Donald Trump to strip away the mask and reveal the troglodyte beneath. Administration officials reportedly labored to keep him from going on the attack against Blasey, but after a few days, the presidential id once again rose up and overwhelmed them and their message. On Friday morning, Trump tweeted:

“I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with Local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!”

Blasey has already said that she did not tell anyone about the assault at the time, much less file charges — most victims don’t. So what Trump is charging here, complete with a snide slap at Blasey’s parents, is straightforward: The woman is lying.

This is the response we have come to expect from this president when accusations of sexual assault or harassment surface. It is how Trump has responded to the 15-plus women who have accused him of sexual misconduct. It is how he has responded to the women (and men) who have accused other officials within his party.

Outside of Trump’s bubble, however, it is widely recognized as no longer acceptable to respond to a woman’s claims of sexual assault by calling her a liar. Doing so carries real political risks in the age of #MeToo. Which is why so many Republicans have been working themselves into a lather to discredit Blasey by more nuanced means.

Witness the popular mistaken-identity theory that says Blasey isn’t lying about the attack but is simply confused about who did the attacking. Kavanaugh himself planted this seed in the brain of Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, at least according to the senator’s office, and the nominee’s defenders have been peddling extended versions of it with gusto. This includes a bonkers incident Thursday night in which a longtime conservative operative, Edward Whelan, posted a series of tweets offering up the name, photo and other private information about a former classmate of Kavanaugh’s who Whelan claimed might be the real attacker. The tweets were deleted after they prompted a massive backlash on social media — and after Blasey said she knew both men and even at the tender age of 15 could tell them apart.

As insulting as this “she’s just a confused girl” defense may be, it is modestly less offensive than the snickering boys-will-be-boys excuses emanating from certain musty corners. Or the related contention that this was a case of teenage horseplay gone awry — an innocent misunderstanding, if you will. The most head-smacking defense thus far may have come from Franklin Graham, the evangelical leader turned Trump lackey, who spun the alleged attack as a portrait in chivalry: “Well, there wasn’t a crime committed. These are two teenagers, and it’s obvious that she said no and he respected it and walked away.”

What all of these approaches have in common is that they are part of a desperate effort to distract from Republicans’ unwillingness to initiate a proper effort to get at the truth of what happened. It is a sorry abdication of duty damaging to all involved. At this point, Blasey’s accusations need to be examined not only for her sake but for that of Kavanaugh and of the entire Supreme Court — especially if Republicans are convinced of the nominee’s innocence.

The FBI investigated Hill’s accusations, and it should investigate Blasey’s. Immediately. The Senate Judiciary Committee should do its job properly by holding thorough hearings with a full slate of witnesses — most definitely including Kavanaugh’s friend Mark Judge, who Blasey says was in the room on the night in question. The fact that Judge has said he does not want to testify should make lawmakers all the more curious about what he would have to say. It does not, as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has absurdly asserted, mean that Judge has “already said what he’s going to say” and there’s “no reason to” hear from him under oath.

Instead, Republicans have repeatedly made clear that, even as they go through the motions of responding to Blasey’s accusations, they have no intention of letting this nomination get derailed. On Friday, the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., spoke at the Values Voter Summit, reassuring evangelical activists that the Senate was going to “plow right through” and, “In the very near future, Judge Kavanaugh will be on the United States Supreme Court.” Similarly, late Wednesday night, Mike Davis, a top Republican staffer for the Senate Judiciary Committee, tweeted, “Unfazed and determined. We will confirm Judge Kavanaugh.”

The needle that Republicans have been trying to thread is exceedingly fine — and they have been doing a rotten job of it. Which is why Trump’s tweet was something of a relief in its shredding of pretense. As the president sees it, this woman isn’t to be believed, and that’s that — just what the Republican lawmakers seem to think but won’t say.

Trump’s slap at Blasey was not his only Friday-morning tweet on the subject. He also took aim at Democrats — or, as he termed them, “radical left wing politicians who don’t want to know the answers, they just want to destroy and delay. Facts don’t matter.”

Sadly, the president is spot on that “Facts don’t matter” in this nominating circus, and that certain politicians “don’t want to know the answers.” He just seems to have badly misspelled the word “Republicans.”