Editorial: It's about what's best for an entire community, not what a parent might prefer
Monday, Aug. 16, 2021 -- While most parents might be able to determine what they BELIEVE is best for THEIR children, they are not empowered to impose what is best for other children, parents, teachers or other school workers. That is how a representative democracy works. We elect school boards, city and county commissions, state officials, members of Congress and our president to make decisions on what they view is best for our communities, state and nation. With our votes, we entrust them to consider what is best for the entire community. If we don't like what they do, we can our disagreement and, when their terms in office re up, vote them out if we still aren't happy.
Posted — UpdatedIn western North Carolina COVID-19 pandemic deniers and anti-maskers have gone over the top with actions that are troublingly reflective of the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection in Washington D.C.
“You are not dictators, and you do not get to tell us what we can and cannot do with our children,” said Stephanie Parsons, one of the protesters. Congressman Madison Cawthorn was present at the meeting and egged the mini insurrectionists on – a reprise of his Jan. 6 performance.
Where do they get these notions? Unfortunately, from opportunistic politicians like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. "I want to empower parents to be able to make the best decisions they can for the well-being of their children," DeSantis declared after announcing an executive order to prevent Florida local school boards from adopting mask mandates.
While most parents might be able to determine what they BELIEVE is best for THEIR children, they are not empowered to impose what is best for other children, parents, teachers or other school workers. That is how a representative democracy works.
In our form of popularly elected representative government, we get to elect officials – school boards, city and county commissions, state officials, members of Congress and our president – to make decisions on what they view is best for our communities, state and nation.
With our votes, we entrust them not to consider what is best for an individual, not for themselves, but the entire community. If we don’t like what they do, we can petition to express our disagreement and, when their terms in office re up, vote them out if we still aren’t happy with their performance.
This is not a strange notion. It is the way things work with the rights we have in our Constitution.
The Second Amendment’s right to bear arms doesn’t offer anyone unfettered use of a gun. It cannot be used as a murder weapon. Free speech is not absolute but is bound for example by libel and threats of bodily harm.
To put it most simply, limits on individual liberty arise when they threaten the basic rights – life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness – of others.
It is not easy. It may not be what some individual parents or students believe is best for them. But it is a decision based on what they see as best for the community.
The actions by our elected officials aren’t new or unique. It is not a threat to any liberties or rights.
As related to the efforts to stem the spread of the deadly COVID-19 virus, it is just what we should want them to do – going beyond selfish personal desires to make the first priority looking after the community’s best interest.
Copyright 2024 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.