Bombs' fallout: Race issues, Russian bots, media distrust
Posted March 22, 2018 2:31 p.m. EDT
AUSTIN, Texas -- Five bombings in the past three weeks, which killed two and injured four before the suspect died Wednesday, was plenty to put all of Austin on edge. But another incendiary layer to this saga has been playing out on social media.
VOTE! IT'S A RIGHT & DUTY
Vote by Mail (request a ballot by Oct. 27) HERE
Vote Early In Person (Oct. 15-Oct. 31) HERE
Vote On Election Day (Nov. 3) HERE
The hashtag AustinBombings has been trending on Twitter in part because of all of the media coverage -- and in part because of complaints about the perceived lack of media coverage, even as the bombings have dominated the Austin American-Statesman's online and print editions, not to mention all of the reporting from local and national TV and radio outlets.
Yes, there's the obvious: Some people aren't exactly keeping up with the news, especially in their self-contained social media bubbles.
But go deeper, and you'll find real anxiety about race and distrust of the media.
Go deeper still, according to NPR, and you'll find Russian bots amplifying the whole thing.
The first three bombs killed two African-American men and injured a Hispanic woman, raising the specter these might be hate crimes, particularly because the two slain men belonged to prominent East Austin families connected to Wesley United Methodist Church.
The Statesman provided extensive coverage of those bombings and the growing investigation, as well as the explosion that injured two white men in Southwest Austin and the early Tuesday explosion of an Austin-bound package at a FedEx facility in Schertz.
But for some observers in other cities who, for whatever reason, initially heard little about these bombings, the story line tapped into longstanding concerns that the media does not cover tragedies in communities of color with the same vigor as calamities affecting whites.
"In general, people don't trust the media," Mia Moody-Ramirez, a University of Texas journalism grad and Baylor University professor specializing in media and race issues, told me by phone this week. "They think some stories will be highlighted more than others."
These reactions reminded me of the social media outrage in 2015, when some indignant posts asked why the terrorist attacks at a Paris concert hall and restaurant drew far more media coverage than did the slaughter of 147 people in a Kenya school attack. Only the facts didn't bear that out. Every major news outlet did cover the Kenyan terrorist attack and in great detail.
Some critics don't understand why the Austin bombings haven't drawn the same kind of round-the-clock national TV coverage as other big stories, such as Hurricane Harvey or the contentious 2016 election, Moody-Ramirez said. But these bombings are the subject of an intense investigation that has produced very little information to sustain the cable news channels' attention.
The American-Statesman has memorialized the victims of these bombings, chronicled the anxiety of a community, illustrated how other bombing suspects were eventually caught and questioned the Austin Police department's early efforts to tamp down fears by suggesting the first bombing was an isolated incident.
But until Wednesday, we didn't know who was unleashing these attacks and why, or how the victims were chosen -- if they were purposely chosen at all.
"I think regarding the bombing, people want a different kind of coverage," Moody-Ramirez said. "They want answers the media can't give right now."
And thanks again to social media, what would normally be the complaints of a few become retweeted and "liked" tens of thousands of times with the help of another divisive force.
NPR's national security editor Philip Ewing reported Monday evening that some of the activity on Twitter "appears initially to be connected with the Russian social media agitation that we've sort of gotten used to since the 2016 presidential race."
How can we tell?
"There are dashboards and online tools that let us know which accounts are focusing on which hashtags from the Russian influence-mongers who've been targeting the United States since 2016 and they, too, have been tweeting about Austin bombings today," Ewing reported.
And as they did after the Charlottesville protests, last year's Alabama Senate campaign and the tug-of-war over NFL players kneeling during the national anthem, Ewing said, the Russian bots are jacking up the volume on social media debates to make Americans feel even more bitterly divided. All of this comes amid new reporting on the alleged Facebook abuses by Cambridge Analytica to potentially sway elections.
When people distrust reporters and feel overwhelmed by the conflicting noise on social media, some tune out altogether. Jena Heath, a former Statesman editor who now teaches journalism at St. Edward's University, is glued to current events, but she can understand why some people opt out.
"We live in a surreal time," she said. "I think people feel bombarded, I think they feel overwhelmed, less in control of the levers of their society, less able to affect change. And so when people feel this way, they pull back, they stop participating.
"Then something really directly relevant to their lives happens, and there's a sense of, Why didn't anybody tell me about this?"
Bridget Grumet writes for the Austin American-Statesman. Email: bgrumet(at)statesman.com.
Story Filed By Cox Newspapers
For Use By Clients of the New York Times News Service
Capitol Broadcasting Company's Opinion Section seeks a broad range of comments and letters to the editor. Our Comments beside each opinion column offer the opportunity to engage in a dialogue about this article.
In addition, we invite you to write a letter to the editor about this or any other opinion articles. Here are some tips on submissions >> SUBMIT A LETTER TO THE EDITOR