NC TikTok influencer liable for ending a marriage, must pay $1.7 million

A jury ordered a TikTok influencer to pay over a million dollars to a woman for breaking up her marriage, and North Carolina is one of the only states where this is legal. WRAL's Dan Haggarty explains how this all started and why it is still on the books.
Posted 11/13/2025, 7:35:44 PM Updated 11/13/2025, 8:00:07 PM

1, 3, 6,

>> ALL RIGHT. LET'S TALK ABOUT

ONE OF THE CRAZIEST NEWS

STORIES THAT WE HAVE SEEN THIS

WEEK. A TIKTOK INFLUENCER

ORDERED TO PAY 1.7 MILLION

DOLLARS FOR BREAKING UP A

DURHAM COUPLE'S MARRIAGE.

THIS WAS A WHOLE THING. ALL

RIGHT. IT WAS A CASE IN CIVIL

COURT, A ON TO YOU. SHE IS

ACCUSED. SHE ACCUSED, I SHOULD

SAY, BRON A CANARD OF HAVING AN

AFFAIR WITH HER EX HUSBAND,

TIM. HE WAS CAN ART MANAGER

AND NOW HE'S HER HUSBAND.

MONTE. YOU CLAIMS THAT CANARD

BROKE UP THEIR MARRIAGE CAUSING

HER MENTAL ANGUISH AND

DEPRIVING HER KIDS HAVE A 2

PARENT HOUSEHOLD AND THE JURY

AGREED.

>> SHE

>> HAS RECEIVED JUSTICE FROM

LOWE'S AND HER HUSBAND AND THE

FATHER OF HER CHILDREN.

>> NORTH CAROLINA, I SHOULD

SAY, IS ONE OF THE ONLY STATES

THAT LETS PEOPLE DO THIS SORT

OF THING TO FILE OVER OVER THIS

WHERE A JURY WILL ACTUALLY

WEIGH IN ON YOUR AFFAIR.

THINK ABOUT THAT. IT'S COLD

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION AND TO

WIN ONE OF THESE CASES, YOU

HAVE TO PROVE 3 THINGS. ONE

THAT A LOVING AFFECTIONATE

MARRIAGE EXISTED TOO, THAT

SOMEONE CAME IN AND KNOWINGLY

WRECKED IT AND 3 THAT YOU

SUFFERED AS A RESULT. AGAIN,

DID YOU KNOW THIS WAS A THING

WE WANTED TO KNOW WHY IT WAS A

THING. AND WHERE DID IT ALL

COME FROM? AND WHY IS NORTH

CAROLINA? ONE OF THE ONLY

PLACES THAT STILL ALLOWS IT?

HOW DID WE GET HERE?

>> WE COULD TAKE IT ALL THE WAY

BACK TO THE TEUTONIC TRIBES IN

105, BC WHAT HAS BEEN COULD

KILL A MAN FOR SLEEPING WITH

HIS WIFE. BUT LET'S SKIP AHEAD,

SHALL WE? TO 17? 45 1 OF THE

FIRST ALIENATION OF AFFECTION

CASES WINDS MORE VERSUS GREEN

BANK IN ENGLISH COURT OF COMMON

PLEAS. IF YOU COULDN'T TELL,

THE HUSBAND CLAIMED A MAN

MALICIOUSLY AND WICKEDLY

PERSUADED PRO KILLED AND

ENTICED HIS WIFE, THE HUSBAND

OF ONE. AT THE TIME A WIFE WAS

CONSIDERED PROPERTY AND LOSING

THAT PROPERTY ENTITLED A

HUSBAND TO COMPENSATION IT

WASN'T UNTIL 18, 66 THAT ONE OF

THESE CASES POPPED UP IN THE

UNITED STATES. THE WIFE

CHEATED. THE HAS BEEN SUED AND

HE WON. BUT OVER THE NEXT 50

YEARS, COURTS AND LAWMAKERS

RULED WIVES WERE NOT PROPERTY

AND THEY HAVE EQUAL RIGHTS TO

THEIR HUSBANDS. AND IF THEIR

HUSBANDS SHE DID, THEY COULD

SUE TO SUDDENLY IN THE 1930'S

LAWMAKERS GOT WORRIED ABOUT

BLACKMAIL AND EXTORTION SAYING

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION DIDN'T

WORK ANYMORE IN 1935, INDIANA

BECAME THE FIRST STATE TO BAN

IT SINCE THEN. 42 STATES HAVE

BANNED SUING A SPOUSE OVER

INFIDELITY. EVEN ENGLAND, THE

PLACE WHERE IT ALL STARTED

BANNED IT IN 1970, BUT NOT IN

NORTH CAROLINA. WE'RE ONE OF A

HANDFUL OF STATES THAT HAVE

KEPT IT GOING TO THIS DAY.

AND WE'VE SEEN LOTS OF

HIGH-PROFILE CASES AS A RESULT

IN 1999, A WHITE SUIT, HER

HUSBAND FOR SLEEPING WITH THE

SECRETARY, THE WIFE ONE GETTING

HALF A MILLION DOLLARS. AND

AFTER THE TRIAL, THE HUSBAND

MARRIED TO THE SECRETARY.

THE STORY WAS TURNED INTO A

LIFETIME MOVIE. IT WAS CALLED

THE PRICE OF A BROKEN HEART

IN 2011 CASE OUT OF WAKE

COUNTY. AND AS WITH THE

DEFENDANT PAYING 30 MILLION

DOLLARS IN DAMAGES IN 2017, A

CASE NEARLY SPELL THE END OF

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION FOR

THE STATE SUPREME COURT RULED

ONLY THE LEGISLATURE COULD END

THAT PRACTICE FOR GOOD AND THE

LEGISLATURE HAS TRIED AND

FAILED BILLS TO BAN ALIENATION

OF AFFECTION IN NORTH CAROLINA

HAVE BEEN COMING UP FOR

DECADES. NONE HAVE BEEN

SUCCESSFUL. IN FACT, THERE'S

ONE IN COMMITTEE NOW WHO KNOWS

IF IT WILL GET A VOTE IN THE

MEANTIME, YOU CAN STILL SUE

AND WIN IF YOUR SPOUSE CHEATS

AND THAT'S HOW WE GOT HERE.

>> SO THERE YOU HAVE IT.

BUT THAT THAT ONE QUESTION DOES

REMAIN. WHY? WHY IS ALIENATION

OF AFFECTION? STILL A THING

HERE IN NORTH CAROLINA. SO

LET'S THINK ABOUT AT LEAST ONE

OF THE ARGUMENTS AS TO WHY SO

FIRST, YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER,

THIS IS NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

THIS ALL HAPPENS IN CIVIL

COURT. THAT JUDGE JUDY STUFF,

CIVIL COURT IS WHERE YOU GO

WHEN YOU'VE BEEN WRONGED.

BUT NO ONE IS GOING TO GO TO

JAIL FOR THAT USUALLY MEANS

IT'S BECAUSE IT INVOLVES SOME

MONEY. YES, THE STORIES ARE

SALACIOUS. GOT A MARRIED

COUPLE. HAPPY BY ALL ACCOUNTS.

AND ONE DAY, A SPOUSE GET

SEDUCED BY SOMEONE WHO KNEW

THEY WERE MARRIED IN. THE WHOLE

THING GOES UP IN FLAMES.

BUT LOOK, DON'T FORGET IT.

HEART ISN'T THE ONLY THING THAT

GETS BROKEN INTO IN A SITUATION

LIKE THAT OFTEN TIMES. SO DOES

EVERYTHING ELSE. THE HOUSE CARS

BANK ACCOUNTS TIME WITH THE

KIDS, ET CETERA. AND THAT'S

WORTH SOMETHING. AND IT COSTS

A LOT. SHOULDN'T THE INNOCENT

PARTY BE MADE WHOLE? THAT'S

THE ARGUMENT. THE WAY

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION CASES

RARELY MAKE IT AS FAR AS THE

ONE WE SAW THIS WEEK, THE

BURDEN OF PROOF IS PRETTY HIGH

IN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

IS STRICT IS A DIFFICULT

OPTION. BUT IT IS AND OPTION