In-depth with Dan Haggerty: Project 2025 vs Trump's agenda

Dan Haggerty goes into a detailed comparison between Project 2025 and Trump's agenda.
Posted 7/19/2024, 11:42:05 PM Updated 7/20/2024, 12:58:07 AM

>> AS OUR CHIEF LAW ENFORCER.

>> NOW IT'S TIME FOR MORE FUN

WITH AN FUN THINGS AS WE

CONTINUE TO EXPLORE A DOCUMENT

THAT'S SOME DEMOCRATS

COLORFULLY DESCRIBED AS

TERRIFYING DYSTOPIAN AND THE

END OF DEMOCRACY. PROJECT 2025

IS A 922 PAGE PROPOSAL OF

CONSERVATIVE IDEAS MEANT AS A

GUIDELINE FOR A REPUBLICAN

PRESIDENT. IT WAS DRAFTED BY A

CONSERVATIVE THINK TANK IN DC

CALLED THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION

WHICH HAS BEEN DRAFTING THE

SOURCE TO FOR DECADES. THIS

SPECIFIC DRAFT, THOSE GETTING A

LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE IT

PROPOSES SOME PRETTY DRAMATIC

CHANGES TO OUR STRUCTURE OF

GOVERNMENT AND WAS WRITTEN BY

DOZENS OF PEOPLE LINKED TO

DONALD TRUMP AND HIS

PRESIDENCY. NOW, TRUMP, I HAVE

TO MENTION DISAVOWS THIS PLAN

THOUGH. HIS CAMPAIGN IS

POINTING US TO TRUMP'S PLAN

INSTEAD COLD AGAIN. DE 47.

NOW WE DID AN ENTIRE SEGMENT ON

THIS ON WEDNESDAY. YOU CAN FIND

THAT ON WRAL DOT COM OR

YOUTUBE. BUT TONIGHT. WE'RE

GOING TO PLAY A LITTLE GAME

OF RED LIGHT GREEN LIGHT WITH

THE DEMOCRAT'S ASSERTION THAT

PROJECT 2025 IS IN FACT,

SECRETLY TRUMP'S AGENDA.

WHERE IS THAT CORRECT? AND

WHERE SHOULD WE SLOW DOWN A BIT

AND TAKE A CLOSER LOOK. LET'S

GO IN DEATH.

OK? WE'RE GOING INTO A LOT

HERE. SO SO STAY WITH ME.

ALL RIGHT. WE'VE BEEN GETTING

TONS OF E-MAILS ABOUT THIS.

SO HERE'S WHAT WE'RE GOING TO

DO IT. WE'RE GOING TO READ

THOSE E-MAILS, ANSWER THOSE

QUESTIONS. AND WHEN YOU ISSUE

BY ISSUE, ACCORDING TO WHAT WE

SEE IN THE AGENDA IS IF YOU

HAVE MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT

SPECIFIC POLICIES SEND THE MUD

AND WRAL DOT COM. IF WE DON'T

TALK ABOUT YOURS TONIGHT, DON'T

WORRY. WE'RE GOING TO KEEP

WORKING ON THIS. LET'S START

WITH THE BIGGIE FROM TAMPA WHO

SAYS PLEASE EMPHASIZE WHAT THEY

INTEND FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION.

SO THIS IS A GREEN LIGHT

PROJECT 2025 AND A TRUMP GO

HAND IN HAND ON THIS ISSUE.

BOTH CALL FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION TO BE DISBANDED.

IT'S REALLY THAT SIMPLE.

THE NEXT ONE FROM CARLA, SHE

ASKED HOW ABORTION REPRODUCTIVE

RIGHTS BE IMPACTED. SO WE GOT

TO HIT THE BRAKES ON THIS ONE.

WE SHOULD STOP ASSUMING THAT

THE AGENDA IS LINE UP PERFECTLY

ON THIS ISSUE. TRUMP'S PLATFORM

DOES NOT CALL FOR A NATIONWIDE

ABORTION BAN. IT SAYS WE

PROUDLY STAND FOR FAMILIES AND

LIFE. WE WILL OPPOSE LATE TERM

ABORTION PROJECT 2025 DOESN'T

PROPOSE A NATIONWIDE ABORTION

BAN EITHER. BUT IT DOES WANT TO

BAN ON ABORTION PILLS AND CALLS

TO REVERSE APPROVAL OF CHEMICAL

ABORTION DRUGS. NOW SEVERAL

SO ASKED ABOUT A TERM A TERM

FETAL PERSONHOOD, WHICH IS A

LEGAL TERM THAT CONSIDERS

EMBRYOS AND FETUSES TO BE

PEOPLE AND TO HAVE RIGHTS.

BUT THAT TERM NEVER APPEARS IN

EITHER PROJECT 2025 OR AGENDA.

47, HERE IS ANOTHER ONE.

A BIG ONE FROM LUIS HOUSE

IMMIGRATION ADDRESSED. WELL,

GREEN AGAIN ON THIS ONE PROJECT

2025 AND TRUMP BOTH WANT TO

BEEF UP THE BORDER PATROL.

THEY WANT TO FINISH THE BORDER

WALL AND THEY WANT TO DEPORT

MILLIONS OF PEOPLE LIVING IN

THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY. PROJECT

2025. GOES A LITTLE BIT MORE

DETAIL. BUT THE OVERARCHING

SENTIMENT IS PRETTY MUCH THE

SAME. PAT HIT 3 BIG TOPICS.

HE ASKED, WILL THERE BE ANY

CUTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY,

MEDICARE, MEDICAID AND VETERANS

BENEFITS? LET'S SLOW DOWN ON

ALL FACE PROJECT 2025, FOR

INSTANCE, DOESN'T CALL FOR ANY

CUTS OR PROTECTIONS TO SOCIAL

SECURITY. IN FACT, SOCIAL

SECURITY BENEFITS ARE NEVER

REALLY DIRECTLY ADDRESSED IN

THE DOCUMENT. MEANWHILE,

TRUMP'S AGENDA, 47 IS VERY

CLEAR, NO CUTS AND NO CHANGES

TO THE RETIREMENT AGE. WHAT

ABOUT MEDICARE AND MEDICAID

WILL PROJECT 2025. DOESN'T

EXPLICITLY CALL FOR CUTS

EITHER. BUT THIS SECTION ABOUT

MEDICAID IS GETTING A LOT OF

ATTENTION TO AD TARGETED TIME

LIMITS OR LIFETIME CAPS ON

BENEFITS TO DISINCENTIVIZE

PERMANENT DEPENDENCE, WHICH

SEEMS TO MEAN THAT PEOPLE WOULD

BE CUT OFF AT SOME POINT, BUT

THEY DON'T ELABORATE ON WHAT

THOSE LIMITS COULD BE AGENDA.

47 DOESN'T MENTION MEDICAID

ALL BUT VOWS TO PROTECT

MEDICARE, MEANING NO CATCH

THERE WITH BETTER AND BENEFITS.

IT GETS A LITTLE BIT

COMPLICATED, LIKE VERY

COMPLICATED. SO TRAUMA BEST TO

BE CONCISE HERE. PROJECT 2025

CALLS FOR A REASSESSMENT OF

WHO GETS DISABILITY AND HOW

MUCH THEY GET. SO WELL. IT

DOESN'T CALL FOR SPECIFIC CUTS.

IT DOES SAY THAT THE VA IS

HANDING OUT TOO MUCH MONEY

AGENDA. 47, THOUGH, SAYS IT

WILL RESTORE THE TRUMP

ADMINISTRATION REFORMS TO

EXPAND VETERANS HEALTH CARE

CHOICES. AND DURING TRUMP'S

PRESIDENCY, THE GOVERNMENT

INCREASED SPENDING FOR VETERANS

AFFAIRS BY BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

I WANT TO END TONIGHT, THOUGH,

BACK WHERE WE STARTED WITH 10'S

E-MAIL ABOUT EDUCATION BECAUSE

IT DOES SPEAK TO A BIGGER THEME

OF CONCERN FROM DEMOCRATS.

A CONCERN OVER POWER. BOTH

PROJECT 2025 AND PRESIDENT

TRUMP INCLUDES CHANGES THAT

WOULD INCREASE PRESIDENTIAL

AUTHORITY AND LIMIT THE

INDEPENDENCE OF FEDERAL

AGENCIES. REPUBLICANS SEE THIS

AS THE ONLY WAY TO BREAK

THROUGH BUREAUCRACY AND MAKE

SOME NOTICEABLE IMPROVEMENTS.

DEMOCRATS THINK ON THE OTHER

HAND, IT OPENS THE DOOR TO

AUTHORITARIAN IS. IT ALL

HINGES, THOUGH, ON ARTICLE 2

SECTION ONE OF THE CONSTITUTION

THAT SAYS THE EXECUTIVE POWER

SHALL BE VESTED IN THE

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA. IT IS THE ULTIMATE

BUCK STOPS HERE IN THE BASIS

FOR SOMETHING CALLED THE

UNITARY EXECUTIVE THEORY.

IT'S THE IDEA THAT THE THE PRES

IS THE BOSS OF ANYTHING THAT

FALLS IN THEIR PURVIEW. AND

WHILE THAT PROBABLY SOUNDS

EXTREME TO A LOT OF YOU CALLING

IT UNPRECEDENTED LIKE SO MANY

HAVE MAYBE A BIT OF AN

EXAGGERATION WE'RE MORE LIKE

THE FROG WHOS JUST REALIZING

THAT THE WATER IS BOILING.

HERE'S HOW DUKE UNIVERSITY

POLITICAL SCIENTIST MAC

MCCORKLE PUT IT.

>> I THINK THE FAIR THING TO

SAY IS OVER AND OVER THROUGHOUT

THE 20TH CENTURY, MORE AND MORE

POWER HAS BEEN CONSOLIDATED

IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH.

SO IT'S NOT LIKE THAT. THIS

IS UNPRECEDENTED IN THAT THIS

HAS BEEN INVOLVING SITUATION.

SO WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT

THAT? WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS?

LET'S GET INTO A DISCUSSION ON

THAT PART NEXT WEEK'S SEND ME

YOUR E-MAILS. GIVE ME YOUR

QUESTIONS AGAIN. IF YOU HAVE

MORE SPECIFIC POLICY QUESTIONS,

LET ME KNOW THOSE TO SOMETHING.

MAYBE WE DIDN'T GET INTO TODAY.

SOMETHING WE DID TALK ABOUT

TODAY. YOU WANT SOME MORE

CLARITY. LET ME KNOW, DAN AT

WRAL DOT COM. TELL ME WHAT'S ON

YOUR MIND.