Duke law professor explains impeachment process

Duke law professor Neil Siegel explains why Democrats would push for impeachment this late in Trump's term and what it could mean for a future run for office.
Posted 1/12/2021, 12:57:07 AM

VOTE PLANNED FOR WEDNESDAY.

BACK TO YOU.

>> MARK, THANK YOU.

>>> DUKE LAW PROFESSOR NEIL

SIEGEL JOINS US NOW TO PUT THIS

INTO BETTER PERSPECTIVE.

PROFESSOR, THANKS FOR TALKING

TO US.

WE TOSS THE WORD IMPEACHMENT

AROUND OFTENTIMES WITHOUT THE

WORDS OF A CONVICTION OR SENATE

TO FOLLOW IT UP.

IS THAT A BIT DANGEROUS ON OUR

PART?

>> I'M NOT SURE IT'S DANGEROUS.

PEOPLE OFTEN CONFUSE

IMPEACHMENT FROM REMOVAL, THE

HOUSE IMPEACHES BY A MAJORITY

VOTE AND THEN THE SENATE

DECIDES WHETHER TO CONVINCE AND

REMOVE THE PRESIDENT FROM

OFFICE.

THAT REQUIRES A TWO-THIRDS

MAJORITY.

IT'S JUST IMPORTANT FOR

AMERICANS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT

THE PROCESS ENTAILS.

>> YOU KNOW, HERE WE ARE ON THE

11th OF JANUARY, THE

INAUGURATION IS NINE DAYS AWAY.

WE HAVE HEARD THIS NEXT

QUESTION ANSWERED SEVERAL

DIFFERENT WAYS.

I'D LIKE TO GET YOUR TAKE.

WHAT IS THE POINT AT THIS

POINT, THE LATENESS OF HIS TERM

TO GO THROUGH AN IMPEACHMENT

PROCESS NOW?

>> I THINK THE POINT WOULD BE

TO PRESERVE THE CONSTITUTION OF

THE UNITED STATES.

TO RESERVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL

GOVERNMENT.

TO PRESERVE DEMOCRACY IN

AMERICA.

TO DECLARE AND DETER THE

PROFOUND ABNORMALITY AND

ANTICONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE

PRESIDENT'S BEHAVIOR SINCE

LOSING THE ELECTION.

HE LOST THE ELECTION.

THIS IS NOT SOMETHING

REASONABLE THAT WE COULD

DISAGREE ABOUT.

IT'S WHAT FEDERAL, STATE

OFFICIALS, REPUBLICANS,

DEMOCRATS, L POLITICIANS, AND

JUDGES HAVE ALL CONCLUDED.

AND YES HE HAS TAKEN A SERIES

OF DANGEROUS ACTIONS SINCE THE

ELECTION TO PRESERVE HIMSELF IN

OFFICE.

HE LIED OVER AND OVER ABOUT THE

OUTCOME.

UNDERMINING AMERICANS TRUST IN

THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.

HE PERSUADED TENS OF MILLIONS

OF HIS SUPPORTERS THAT THERE

WAS MASSIVE FRAUD THAT COST HIM

THE ELECTION.

HE SOLICITED ELECTION FRAUD AND

THREATENED REPUBLICAN OFFICIALS

IN GEORGIA.

HE SOLICITED THE VICE PRESIDENT

TO BETRAY HIS OWN OATH OF

OFFICE BY REJECTING THE

CERTIFIED ELECTION RESULTS WHEN

ALL THE VICE PRESIDENT HAD THE

AUTHORITY TO DO WAS TO OPEN THE

CERTIFICATES CONTAINING THE

RESULTS.

HE ENCOURAGED HIS SUPPORTERS TO

COME TO D.C. FOR WHAT HE

PROMISED WOULD BE A WILD RALLY.

IF THEY DELIVERED A SPEECH THAT

WAS STILL THE VIOLENT IMAGERY

AND REPEATED LIES ABOUT THE

ELECTION.

HE TOLD THEM AMONG OTHER THINGS

THEY WON'T HAVE A COUNTRY

ANYMORE IF THEY DON'T FIGHT

LIKE HELL.

THEN SENT THEM TO CONGRESS.

HE DELAYED RESPONDING TO THE

VIOLENT ATTACK ON THE

LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF OUR

GOVERNMENT.

THEN WHEN HE TOLD THE FOLKS TO

GO HOME, HE MADE MATTERS WORSE

BY FUELING THEIR ANGER THAT

BROUGHT THEM THERE TO BEGIN

WITH, BY REPEATING LIES ABOUT

THE ELECTION.

THEN AFTER THE RIOT ENDED HE

CONDONED THE BEHAVIOR BY SAYING

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN AN

ELECTION IS STOLEN.

YOU CAN LOOK AT SINGLE EPISODES

THAT I JUST RECOUNTED AS

THEMSELVES IMPEACHMENT OR LOOK

AT THE ENTIRE SERIES OF THE

BEHAVIOR BY THE PRESIDENT AND

CONCLUDE THAT AS A WHOLE IT'S

IMPEACHABLE.

BUT MAKE NO MISTAKE WE'RE

TALKING ABOUT BEHAVIOR THAT'S

BEYOND ANY REASONABLE AMERICAN

POLITICS.

THAT'S WHAT THE IMPEACHMENT AND

REMOVAL POWER EXISTS.

IT'S TO DRAW A LINE BEYOND

WHICH NO PRESIDENT IS PERMITTED

TO GO.

>> YOU KNOW, IF THE ARTICLES OF

IMPEACHMENT ARE PASSED BY THE

HOUSE, DO YOU BELIEVE WITH WHAT

YOU JUST LAID OUT.

THERE'S 17 MEMBERS OF THE

REPUBLICAN PARTY IN THE NEW

SENATE THAT WOULD VOTE FOR

CONVICTION.

SINCE IT WOULD TAKE 67 VOTES.

>> I CAN'T POSSIBLY KNOW THE

ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION.

IT IS VERY DIFFICULT IN THE

HYPERPOLARIZING TIMES WE'RE

LIVING TO SECURE 67 VOTES IN

THE SENATE FOR ANYTHING LET

ALONE REMOVING A PRESIDENT FROM

OFFICE.

AND THERE ARE CONCERNS THAT A

TRIAL TAKES PLACE AND THE

PRESIDENT RECEIVES THE SUPPORT

OF AT LEAST ONE-THIRD OF THE

SENATE THAT HE AND FUTURE

PRESIDENTS WILL FEEL ACQUITTED.

SO THERE ARE CONCERNS GOING

FORWARD.

AGAIN, I'M NOT GOING TO PREDICT

THE OUTCOME.

I SUSPECT IT WILL BE MORE

REPUBLICANS THIS TIME THAN LAST

TIME BECAUSE REPUBLICANS LIKE

DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS WERE THE

TARGETS AND VICTIMS OF THE

VIOLENT ASSAULTS THAT TOOK

PLACE.

BUT AGAIN AT THE END OF THE DAY

IT'S NOT FOR ME TO PREDICT WHAT

WILL LIKELY HAPPEN.

>> PROFESSOR NEIL SIEGEL,