All About ZTE, the Chinese Sanctions Breaker That Trump Wants to Help
Posted May 14, 2018 5:59 p.m. EDT
SHANGHAI — President Donald Trump has said that he will help save ZTE, a Chinese electronics-maker. The company was on the brink of collapse after U.S. officials punished it in April for breaking U.S. sanctions against countries including Iran and North Korea.
Here’s a look at how a Chinese electronics-maker with an awkward name came to be at the center of a geopolitical chess match between Beijing and Washington.
— What Is ZTE?
Zhongxing Telecommunications Equipment is not a household name in most places. Known as ZTE, it is probably best known for making cheap smartphones that are mostly sold in developing countries, though it also sells them in the United States.
But in the telecommunications world, the ZTE name carries significant weight. It is one of two Chinese companies — Huawei is the other — that sells equipment for cellular networks. It has about 75,000 employees and says it does business in more than 160 countries.
That makes it an important geopolitical pawn for Beijing, both as an innovator and as a builder of state-funded projects overseas. If China wants to improve ties with a government in the developing world, it often offers loans that can be used to set a ZTE-powered cellular network.
Longer term, China hopes that companies like ZTE will become powerhouses that can help the country wean itself from a reliance on U.S. tech firms, which Beijing views as security threats because of the possibility that they could help Washington spy.
— How Did It Break Sanctions?
Tech supply chains are so intertwined these days that just about every product that ZTE makes has some U.S. components or software in it — think microchips, modems and Google’s Android operating system. So if ZTE sells a smartphone to North Korea, it might also be selling a Qualcomm chip inside that phone. That is illegal under U.S. sanctions that prohibit the sale of U.S. tech to embargoed countries.
When the Commerce Department released its findings against ZTE in 2016, it took the rare step of disclosing evidence of the company’s guilt. One document, signed by several senior ZTE executives, cautioned that U.S. export laws were a risk because the company was selling to “all five major embargoed countries — Iran, Sudan, North Korea, Syria and Cuba.”
A second company document featured flow charts for best practices to circumvent U.S. sanctions. In 2017, ZTE acknowledged its guilt and paid a $1.19 billion fine.
— How Did the U.S. Hobble ZTE?
The Commerce Department did not stop at that hefty penalty.
In April, officials said ZTE had violated its agreement with the United States because it did not punish senior management for having violated the sanctions. Instead, the Commerce Department said, ZTE paid them bonuses and lied about it. As punishment, the department forbade U.S. technology companies from selling their products to ZTE for seven years.
That means no Qualcomm chips or Android software for its phones, and no U.S. chips or other components for its cellular gear. Analysts estimate that four-fifths of ZTE’s products have U.S. companies. ZTE went into a tailspin, saying this past week that it had shut down major operations.
— Why is Trump Intervening?
The U.S. president has not explained his decision to try to help the company, other than to cite the potential for lots of Chinese workers to lose their jobs. But ZTE’s troubles come at a complicated moment.
In normal times, the company’s fate would be a legal matter for the Commerce Department. But the Trump administration is pressuring China to make trade concessions. It also might need Beijing’s help to strike a deal with North Korea as Washington and Pyongyang plan a high-profile meeting next month in Singapore.
By offering to intervene, Trump has effectively suggested that ZTE’s punishment could be a bargaining chip in negotiations with China, rather than a matter of law enforcement. It is not clear whether he will follow through on his offer to help the company or whether he will get something in return if he does.
— A One-Off or Part of a Trend?
The fight over ZTE is emblematic of deeper issues in the relationship between China and the United States, the world’s two largest economies.
Neither country trusts the equipment made by the other, particularly after Edward Snowden disclosed how U.S. intelligence officials turned to U.S. companies to snoop.
With a technological cold war already getting frosty, such squabbles over intertwined supply chains and diverging interests are likely to proliferate.