9th District election fraud now part of federal criminal probe
Federal investigators earlier this month demanded documents in the 9th Congressional District investigation, the first signal of a formal U.S. Department of Justice criminal probe into alleged election fraud in North Carolina.
Posted — UpdatedAn attorney for the Harris campaign Tuesday confirmed to WRAL News that it received a subpoena from the DOJ's Public Integrity Section, but did not provide a copy of the document.
Subpoenas do not appear to have been issued to the elections boards in Bladen or Robeson counties, two areas where Dowless operated. Reached by phone Tuesday, Valeria Peacock McKoy, the interim director of the Bladen County Board of Elections, said she hadn’t received any federal subpoenas. Nor had Tina Bledsoe, interim director of the Robeson County Board of Elections.
Kim Westbrook Strach, executive director of the State Board of Elections, said in a written statement that her agency supports the federal investigation and that her staff is compiling responsive records.
“We hope that prosecutions in these cases will help restore voters’ confidence in our elections and serve as a strong deterrent to future elections fraud,” Strach said.
The State Board of Elections repeatedly asked the Department of Justice to get involved following the 2016 elections, pointing to Bladen County and Dowless' operation, and by the time of the meeting had produced an eight-page report summarizing criminal violations it believed occurred.
Higdon's office last year demanded election data in a seemingly unrelated case, asking for records on 7 million North Carolina voters six weeks before the November election in connection to a secretive U.S. Immigrations and Custom Enforcement probe.
The focus of those indictments, which followed a probe by the State Bureau of Investigation and Wake County District Attorney Lorrin Freeman, was largely on the 2016 general election and the 2018 primary. Freeman said she wanted to avoid interfering with a separate investigation into 2018 by the State Board of Elections that informed the vote last month to hold a new 9th District race.
But with that vote decided – and much of the State Board of Elections' investigative findings now in Freeman's hands – there will likely be more charges in connection with activity during the 2018 election.
• Credits
Copyright 2023 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.